Laserfiche WebLink
entrants to the California market. These Aggregators will compete for funding through Power <br /> Savings Agreements (PSA). <br /> • The Business Equipment Early Retirement HOPP(SDG&E). This pilot is open to all <br /> business customers in the C/I/A segments with aging HVAC equipment. Some old <br /> inefficient equipment has been kept in service past its expected useful life. Customers often <br /> choose to repair, rather than replace, their aging equipment because the current rebates <br /> offered for such measures are insufficient to defray a meaningful portion of new equipment <br /> costs. Such existing equipment may be far below current code. The untapped savings <br /> represented by replacing an old inefficient unit with a new efficient one may be considered <br /> the stranded savings potential. <br /> • The Tiered Incentive Custom Calculated HOPP (SDG&E). This pilot targets mid-sized to <br /> large-sized(above 200kW) non-residential customers with retrofit opportunities for large To- <br /> Code and Above Code energy savings. Tiered Incentives will target customers who have <br /> large To-Code and Above Code projects that have previously been rejected, or those with <br /> known equipment that has not been replaced due a lack of incentives. Historically, utilities <br /> have not been able to provide incentives for projects that yield only To-Code savings which <br /> has created stranded savings in these projects. <br /> HOPP programs offer new opportunities for CCA's to participate in existing energy efficiency <br /> programs while also allowing program administrators added flexibility in program design and <br /> savings attribution. For example, the SDG&E multifamily HOPP may offer a template for <br /> Alameda county to serve it's middle and low income customers, while the PG&E Residential <br /> Pay-for-Performance HOPP may offer opportunities for the County to share in revenue earned <br /> by aggregators of PACE program savings operating within the County, thereby providing an <br /> incentive for the County to help drive and expand these programs. <br /> In summary, the preceding discussion on energy efficiency potential indicates that; <br /> • A review of energy sales and market characteristics indicate that estimates of energy <br /> efficiency potential for the overall PG&E service territory can be allocated to Alameda <br /> County in proportion to the County's share of PG&E total electricity sales, which is about <br /> 7.5%. <br /> • An analysis of the potential study developed by the CPUC to assess the market potential <br /> from energy efficiency in PG&E service territory indicates that there is the potential for <br /> energy efficiency in Alameda County beyond what is being delivered by the current suite of <br /> energy efficiency programs operating in the county. <br /> • A review of current and emerging energy efficiency technologies and innovative new <br /> programs designs indicate that it is possible to install higher levels of energy efficiency than <br /> has historically been achieved at cost-benefit thresholds that are acceptable under current <br /> CPUC guidelines. <br /> F-26 <br />