Laserfiche WebLink
found. shows that this is approximately$3.9M for programs administered by a CCA to all <br /> Alameda County residents, including PG&E customers, or$3.5M if these programs serve only <br /> CCA customers, assuming a 15% opt-out rate. <br /> Table 7.Annual Funding Models for Non-bypassable Electric Charges <br /> Annual Funding Models for Non-bypassable Estimated <br /> Electric Charges Value <br /> Program Administrator-CCA and PG&E customers $3,941,000 <br /> Program Administrator-CCA customer only $3,350,000 <br /> Other funds would also likely be available to help administer energy efficiency programs. An <br /> inexhaustive list of other potential funding sources are listed below. This analysis did not <br /> estimate the potential value of these funds. <br /> • Funds from Non-bypassable Gas Charges—CPUC Decision D.14-10-046 allows CCA's to <br /> administer programs that include funds collected from natural gas customer. This analysis <br /> did not estimate the value of these funds. <br /> • Income from CCA Operations. Income generated through CCA operations may be used to <br /> fund customer programs. <br /> • Funding secured by StopWaste's Energy Council on behalf of any potential relationship <br /> between its member agencies and a CCA. <br /> • Increased funding through the expansion of the CCA territory. Under current regulations it is <br /> allowed for a CCA to define its service territory more broadly than a city or county. As such, <br /> the rules that define the funding for Alameda County residents would apply to new <br /> participants in a CCA and so provide incremental program funding. For example, in 2015 <br /> Marin Clean Energy began serving customer in Contra Costa County and has increased its <br /> available program funding as a result of this enrollment. <br /> CCA's may also choose to not administer programs. CAs' that choose to be non-administrators <br /> have the following authority as defined in R.09-11-014; <br /> If a community choice aggregator is not the administrator of energy efficiency and <br /> conservation programs for which its customers are eligible, the commission shall require the <br /> administrator of cost-effective energy efficiency and conservation programs to direct a <br /> proportional share of its approved energy efficiency program activities for which the <br /> community choice aggregator's customers are eligible, to the community choice <br /> aggregator's territory without regard to customer class. <br /> and <br /> F-29 <br />