My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
100416
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 2:23:44 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 2:50:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/4/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
w <br /> Energy and Demand Savings Potential <br /> The MRW teams defined the level of energy efficiency input into the REMI model would be <br /> based on incremental savings that would result from CCA administered energy efficiency <br /> programs, in excess of the levels of energy efficiency savings targeted by current PG&E <br /> initiatives. The amount of CCA program potential was calculated based on funding available <br /> and the cost of energy efficiency using the following inputs; <br /> • Available annual budget for energy efficacy programs is based on the maximum funding <br /> equation provided in R.09-11-014, and assuming programs are administered only to CCA <br /> customers. As discussed in Error! Reference source not found.,this represents <br /> approximately$3.5M annually. <br /> • The cost of energy efficiency programs most likely to be offered under and a CCA would be <br /> $0.61 per net first year kWh. <br /> • The savings from energy efficiency during the forecast horizon would grow at a rate <br /> consistent with expected annual energy demand as defined in the 2015 CEC IEPR demand <br /> forecast.62 <br /> • Demand savings would be consistent with the ratio of demand to energy savings achieved by <br /> the programs most likely to be offered by a CCA as presented in Error! Reference source <br /> not found.. <br /> Based on this methodology, Error! Reference source not found. provides a summary of REMI <br /> model energy and demand savings inputs. <br /> Table 11. REMI Model Energy and Demand Savings Inputs <br /> Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 <br /> Annual incremental energy 5.7 5.8 5.9 5.9 6.0 6.0 6.1 6.1 6.2 6.3 <br /> savings(GWh) <br /> Annual incremental <br /> demand savings (MW) 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <br /> Economic Activity Related to Energy Efficiency <br /> Based on the energy efficiency analysis factors and definitions provides in Table 9 and Table 10 <br /> respectively, Table 12 provides a summary of the economic inputs from the REMI model that <br /> results from CCA administration of energy efficiency programs as defined above. <br /> 62 Form 1.1 -PGE Planning Area California Energy Demand 2015 Revised-Mid Demand Case.Electricity <br /> Consumption by Sector(GWh) <br /> F-34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.