My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
100416
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 2:23:44 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 2:50:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/4/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ESA Memo to City of Pleasanton:June 13,2016 <br /> There are many tariff offerings provided by PG&E. It is likely that customers within Alameda <br /> County may have as many as 50 unique tariff options. It will be necessary for Alameda CCA to be <br /> cognizant of these tariff options in designing their tariffs to ensure that all customers are fairly <br /> apportioned costs and benefits. These options include fixed charges (usually in$/meter per day in <br /> the billing period),energy charges ($/kwh consumed during the billing period on either a flat, <br /> tiered,seasonal or time of use basis) and demand charges ($/kwh of maximum metered demand <br /> during the billing period on a seasonal,time of use or connected load basis). <br /> The rates customers are charged include many components.The table below illustrates a typical <br /> PG&E residential bill. The key components of the bill are generation charges,distribution charges, <br /> conservation incentive adjustments,transmission charges and other costs. The Alameda CCA can <br /> impact only the generation charge,which typically represents about 50%of the total charge. This <br /> tends to dilute any price advantages that the CCA can gain through energy procurement. <br /> Figure 1: PG&E Residential Rate Breakdown(E-1) <br /> UNBUNDLING OF TOTAL RATES <br /> Energy Rates by Component (S per kWh) <br /> Generation: S0.09684 (R) <br /> Distribution": S0.08338 (I) <br /> Conservation Incentive Adjustment: <br /> Baseline Usage ($0.04544)(R) <br /> 101%- 130% of Baseline (50.00275) (I) <br /> 131% -200% of Baseline $0.05822 (I) <br /> 201%- 300% of Baseline S0.13633 (I) <br /> Over 300% of Baseline $0.13633 (I) <br /> Transmissions (all usage) $0.02144 (I) <br /> Transmission Rate Adjustments* (all usage) $0.00010 (I) <br /> Reliability Services* (all usage) $0.00023 <br /> Public Purpose Programs (all usage) $0.01405 <br /> Nuclear Decommissioning (all usage) $0.00022 <br /> Competition Transition Charges (all usage) 50.00338 <br /> Energy Cost Recovery Amount (all usage) ($0.00002) <br /> DWR Bond all usage) $0.00539 <br /> New System Generation Charge i all usage;" S0.00255 <br /> Source:Peninsula Clean Energy Board Meeting, May 26,2016 <br /> Efficacy of the Three CCA Scenarios <br /> The Study presents three scenarios for the CCA,with differing assumptions concerning the amount <br /> of carbon-free power being supplied to the CCA so as to assess the costs and greenhouse gas (GHG) <br /> emissions reductions possible with the CCA. <br /> Scenario 1 (Renewable Compliance) represents a significant cost savings for consumers across the <br /> customer classes but with a large increase in GHG emissions over the PG&E supply,assuming an <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.