Laserfiche WebLink
compatibility, and (3) undertake other changes to reflect current practice/law and increase the <br /> usability of the document A key objective is to make the regulations in the Zoning Code <br /> easier for members of the community to interpret and use Exhibit A is the proposed <br /> amendment to the Zoning Code <br /> Staff has conducted an extensive outreach effort related to the code amendment, and has <br /> presented the code update and solicited feedback from the Economic Vitality Committee, the <br /> Chamber of Commerce, the Downtown Vitality Committee (a subcommittee of the Pleasanton <br /> Downtown Association), the Pleasanton Downtown Association, and Planning Commission <br /> (during a Work Session on August 31, 2016) Staff also held a Stakeholder Meeting with <br /> interested parties on November 9, 2016, and has met one-on-one with interested members of <br /> the public on an as-requested basis In total, staff has held six stakeholder meetings on the <br /> code amendment The proposed amendment to the code has generally received a favorable <br /> review by these entities, and thus staff is bringing the code amendments forward to the <br /> Planning Commission for a recommendation to City Council <br /> PLANNING COMMVSSION WORK SESSION AND OTHER PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> The tables in Exhibit B to this staff report summarize the comments received to-date, either <br /> from the Planning Commission during its August 31st Work Session (excerpt minutes are <br /> attached as Exhibit C), or from one of the other meetings staff has hosted regarding the Zoning <br /> Code Update The tables are organized into two categories Table 1 identifies the comments <br /> that have been implemented (including a description of how the comments have been <br /> implemented), and Table 2 identifies the comments that are suggested for future updates or <br /> that have not been implemented Generally, staff incorporated comments that were consistent <br /> with the overall objectives of this initial phase of the Zoning Code Update and those that <br /> resulted in clarifications to existing or new definitions or sections of the code Comments that <br /> were not implemented or deferred generally were those that are already addressed by State <br /> law, those that pertain to existing performance standards in the code, or those that are outside <br /> the scope of this phase of the Zoning Code update and would be best addressed in a future <br /> phase of an update Future phases of the Zoning Code Update could include updates to the <br /> Noise Ordinance (Chapter 9 04), evaluating whether uses should be added as permitted or <br /> conditionally permitted uses in zoning districts, or evaluating existing development standards <br /> BACKGROUND/HISTORY <br />! The City Council has identified as a priority an update of the Zoning Code for purposes of <br /> establishing a Minor Conditional Use Permit process and simplifying the development review <br /> process Staff has been working on this update over the last several months, as part of a <br /> broader effort to make the City's development regulations more transparent and easier to <br /> navigate This effort has been paired with the recent development and launch of the City's <br /> new PleasantonPermits portal, which assists applicants in navigating the Zoning Code and <br /> permit process <br /> The Zoning Code divides the City into various zoning or use districts, each of which has its <br /> own list of permitted and conditionally permitted land uses and development regulations (e g , <br /> limitations on building height, building setbacks, and overall square footage), along with a <br /> purpose (e g , to provide appropriately located areas for commercial facilities) The Zoning <br /> P16-1418, Zoning Code Update Planning Commission <br /> Page 2of11 <br />