Laserfiche WebLink
you need to do a CUP for that, what you're saying is you need maybe a Zoning <br /> Administrator approval for something, your concern is that you get an approval which <br /> kind of is the first domino in what you need to get to the end and that's happening <br /> maybe not as publicly as you would like Is that the concern? <br /> Commissioner Balch Don't get me wrong We see it because we see Zoning <br /> Administrator actions, and the one I have is the coding school Not that we said `no' to <br /> the coding school at the Safeway there on Bernal, right, but that one had and correct <br /> me if my memory is incorrect, as it is late in the hour, but the PUD for that had a PUD <br /> Minor Mod the first time though That got approved at the Zoning Administrator level <br /> and then they came in for a CUP which is a very minor CUP, very customary, which <br /> was a Consent item I would like to see that because that means one of those is coming <br /> here <br /> Beaudin I understand, and you will continue to see those things What happens in <br /> those scenarios is, essentially, there is a decision made to allow a particular use even if <br /> it's a conditional use It still has to come to hearing, but what you're essentially seeing is <br /> step 2 when step 1 was really the enabling act on that use <br /> Commissioner Balch When we put in place the Minor CUP process <br /> Beaudin Understood—you want to make sure the full CUP comes back in scenarios <br /> where things are <br /> Commissioner Balch initially on the premise of a Zoning Administrator action If no <br /> Zoning Administrator action is first, meaning you're just a Minor PUD straight up, I have <br /> no problem with that concept I think the noticing that you do, and that was where we <br /> were talking about—I'm jumping around pretty good, but the radius of the notice and the <br /> time—that's where I challenge you to figure out what you can facilitate but not make too <br /> overly burdensome I don't think I personally have a problem with the 10 and I do know <br /> that we could deal with it here knowing that you guys do excellent work to kind of keep <br /> us informed of that, but it's the serial meeting At least that's my biggest sticking point <br /> This we're kind of in with the Community Development Director basically doing similar <br /> uses—that I think is just the reality of a changing world <br /> Beaudin Just to maybe clarify how that's helpful with some of these really old PUDs <br /> We have a lot of Planned Unit Developments in town and when they have that <br /> established use list, what you find is that even if a use is really clear that that's exactly <br /> what you're doing there, it's just not defined that way in the PUD or it's got an old term <br /> or definition and to have to, by strict reading of the code, come to a public setting and <br /> say that's what it is, is something we haven't been doing and we'd like to get clarified in <br /> the code <br /> Commissioner Brown I retract my reservation then, but with those types of examples, <br /> I'm good <br /> Beaudin Okay I'm sorry I was trying to find a fun example My other favorite is doggy <br /> day care which is a great example of a minor use permit where you know, you have to <br /> have your dog on a leash, and you have to figure out the dog waste There's a whole <br /> EXCERPT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 31, 2016 Page 19 of 25 <br />