My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
011717
>
15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2017 4:34:02 PM
Creation date
1/11/2017 11:06:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/17/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
service? Where do you put a laundromat versus a commercial laundry plant, I would <br /> consider putting a commercial laundry plant instead of that because I know that a <br /> laundry plant is where the commercial cleaning of hotel linens and whatnot takes place <br /> versus the corner store <br /> Bonn Yes, so maybe I can clarify that So in the table on Page 23 there's actually a <br /> separate category for laundry So laundries and dry cleaners are permitted uses in the <br /> commercial districts and that's really intended to address the coin machine single <br /> person type use of laundries versus laundry plants which are more industrial in nature <br /> Commissioner Balch Okay, personal and general services Okay, so the definition on <br /> page 13 should correlate to general services to include all these types of things, right? <br /> That's the concept we're working with <br /> Beaudin Yes <br /> Commissioner Balch Okay, not that a change is needed I was just reading it When I <br /> read personal services, I didn't know if laundromats are allowed in it because it is a little <br /> bit more unique and different given the nature of that versus the ones that are in that <br /> example But, it's not <br /> Weinstein Yeah, what we did, again, we were moving away from these long lists of <br /> uses and to replace those we had these broader categories and wanted to make sure <br /> the broader categories are useful so we felt like we needed to provide some examples <br /> of those uses in the definitions, but we didn't want to put every single potential use in <br /> the definition, so that's what you're seeing <br /> Commissioner Nagler Also if I could just as a general comment, I appreciate the utility <br /> of going through the specific lists The real sort of action though of this table is what's <br /> conditional and what's permitted, right? <br /> Commissioner Balch And what's out Prohibited uses is anything not one of those two <br /> Commissioner Nagler Right, and so I don't know tonight is not the night, but I think <br /> that even though we're all supposed to use it, I think this conversation's been very <br /> illuminating and that what we all ought to take as assignments after the meeting is to go <br /> back to this table and review what is permitted and conditional, and as Mr Hirst has <br /> done really makes specific recommendations about whether they're categorized <br /> properly because that's <br /> Chair Ritter I think that's what Gerry was saying Send them a note and let them <br /> know I see bed and breakfasts Does that include VRBO if people wanted to do that or <br /> Airbnb? <br /> Weinstein So VRBO's and Airbnb's and the like are sort of in a grey area in our code <br /> right now and are not explicitly listed as allowed so they are theoretically prohibited, but <br /> we acknowledge that Airbnb's and the like can be good things for our local economy so <br /> we're trying to tread pretty lightly on those right now until we have more resolution in <br /> terms of what our actual City policy should be So we're dealing with them on a code <br /> enforcement basis as people voice complaints about them <br /> EXCERPT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 31, 2016 Page 22 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.