15 - Laserfiche WebLink

I would propose that commercial be in Section A and residential be B as opposed to melding them, but I will look to my peers here, because I think that's why when people talk about downtown they talk about a vibrant business district and that's what Scott Raty came to talk about—business thrives vitality Chair Ritter What other areas are the Central Commercial districts? This isn't just downtown in 18 44 030, is it's Bonn It's predominantly downtown There's straight zoning that has the C-C designation like Rosewood Commons as Gerry mentioned earlier, and there probably are a handful of PUDs that refer back to the C-C district So half of Rosewood Commons is PUD-C and it refers back to the C-C district with some exceptions The other half of Rosewood Commons is straight zoned C-C and there's probably a couple of other examples as well Commissioner Brown I'm not sure Rosewood Commons would fit into this definition, right, if you're targeting it towards the downtown? Beaudin Right, we really need our DSP update to take the lead on these and so that's part of what we'll be trying to accomplish The C-C district, because it does apply elsewhere in the City, the idea of pedestrian scale, the idea of encouraging mixed use— those are somewhat similar planning directions that we've been giving folks for our downtown based on the existing DSP and in Rosewood Commons where they're contemplating the residential projects that were contemplated during the Housing Element process So, whether its horizontal mixed use or vertical mixed use, it becomes more of the conversation This doesn't tie you're hands one way or the other Commissioner Balch Well, the pedestrian element across anything in the City in my opinion should be supported I mean, we've got to get out of our cars, nght7 So I don't have a problem with that I'm hearing everything everyone is saying I do support the idea of adding the commercial I think that might be our little compromise here The intensive development language from my point, I think I'm going to punt I could go either way I understand what staff is saying that basically it's been there and it's kind of the grandfathered language they have inherited to edit, so I'm not really sure now would be the time in my opinion to alter it I apologize Nancy, I didn't get your A versus B and I just want to make sure I understand that comment Where was that at? Was that in the Point 10 part in the Purpose? Commissioner Allen It was the top of page 19, "The purpose of the District is as follows" Gerry's proposal was to have one sentence that had commercial and residential Mine was just to say Point A would focus on the purpose to have a vibrant business commercial center that's pedestrian scale and supports and complements other downtown businesses and draws people into downtown Point A would focus on the business side of the C-C district Commissioner Balch So you would add that in'? Commissioner Allen Yes EXCERPT DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 21 of 30