15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Brown I think Commissioner Balch also wanted to see that if I'm not mistaken Commissioner Balch I'm going to echo that and I'm thinking and I want to make sure we're talking about the same thing, I'm thinking that on the first time you introduce the chart, the top of the chart, C-N is Commercial Neighborhood written out because I have to go look up again and the M versus the P in Commercial Region 1 and Mall versus Periphery So, it just takes time I think in terms of users, you guys have such a quick knowledge that you'll handle acronyms well The user is taking time, so maybe it's on the first page of the table and not necessarily repeated every page therein Like Industrial Park versus Industrial General, right'? Office, Commercial Freeway, Commercial Service, and now I'm getting used to them Bonn Would it be acceptable to the Commission to actually list it underneath the text that's identified up on top, you know, where we have the bold text where it talks about properties in the PUD and then the PUD shall be consulted Would it be acceptable to itemize what all of those are as opposed to the row that includes the abbreviation'? Commissioner Balch I think any way you would fit it If I could get it and again, I'm thinking I would only do it on page 1 of the table For further pages, they might need the legend, but that's my opinion Commissioner Brown I even think that the three lines that you have is kind of a bit unnecessary If I was doing it I would just put TC=Temporary Conditional, P=Permitted, etc Bullets Sorry, I'm used to PowerPoint in my daily job I guess Commissioner Balch Can I just add to that'? I think that was a reason again for me is because the Commercials are all listed up in the first couple of pages, but the Industrial Park and Industrial General is not It's listed a little further back, so you've got to go back there to confirm your knowledge on what those area, again for the user Bonn That's all good We can figure out a way to incorporate it Commissioner Brown Okay, fair enough I did have a question on Item 14 and if you Y, 9 q Y could explain that a little more to me—Item 14 in Table 2 which is page 8 of Exhibit B, I think I raised this last time—why we are classifying restaurants past 11 00 p m and you reference that it was implemented in preparation for the Downtown Hospitality Guidelines Can you just expand on that'? Bonn Sure, so previously the definition for restaurant versus bars included a 10 00 p m cutoff for the sale of alcohol So by definition of restaurant that sold alcohol past 10 00 p m was classified as a bar for purposes of the zoning code That was modified to 11 00 p m as part of the Downtown Hospitality Guidelines One of the comments we received for this update to the zoning code is that restaurants serving alcohol past 11 00 p m should not be classified as bars, and we're proposing not to address that at this time given it was very recently addressed with the Hospitality Guidelines Commissioner Brown Okay, all right EXCERPT DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 28 of 30