Laserfiche WebLink
but not to the private balconies, patios, or porches. The noise study indicates that special <br /> building treatments (i.e., construct exterior walls with either resilient channels, double-stud with <br /> resilient channels, or two layers of gypsum board and have windows and exterior doors of the <br /> units meeting Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings between 34-36 for Site 1 and 32-34 for <br /> Site 2) will be required in order meet the noise standards. <br /> Noise Impacts on Adjacent Properties <br /> p J p <br /> The development of commercial and residential uses on the two sites will generate added <br /> urban noise, such as traffic, children playing, etc. However, given the existing noise levels <br /> produced by nearby freeway and street traffic, and the existing commercial and office uses in <br /> the area, noise levels will not change substantially from that currently experienced in the area. <br /> Furthermore, ambient noise levels could actually decrease for the existing uses south of the <br /> project sites due to the shielding of freeway traffic noise by the proposed buildings. <br /> To ensure compliance with noise requirements conditions of approval have been added <br /> requiring the applicant to adhere to the noise attenuation measures outlined in the noise study. <br /> Furthermore, the City's Noise Ordinance and standard conditions of approval limit construction <br /> activity to certain hours when it will be less disturbing to neighbors. <br /> Grading/Drainage <br /> The majority of the two lots are relatively level. Except for minor grading, the applicant is <br /> proposing to generally maintain the existing grades on both properties. Parking lot and roof <br /> drainage would drain into bioretention areas (vegetation-lined swales) and biofiltration planters <br /> that would filter contaminants from the parking lot and roof drainage before entering the <br /> arroyos and, ultimately, the bay. These are the types of stormwater runoff measure strongly <br /> supported by the Regional Water Quality Control Board and local agencies like Pleasanton <br /> implementing the urban clean water runoff program. Overall, staff finds the proposed grading <br /> and drainage plan to be acceptable, as conditioned, and that it incorporates a sufficient <br /> number of stormwater runoff measures. <br /> Landscaping <br /> Preliminary landscaping plans were submitted showing planting details for the two sites. <br /> Although the landscape plans are conceptual, staff feels that the amount and species type of <br /> the proposed landscaping for both sites is consistent with the TOD Guidelines. Standard <br /> conditions of approval regarding landscaping will ensure a much more detailed plan at the <br /> building permit stage when final landscape and irrigation plans are reviewed and approved by <br /> the Director of Community Development. <br /> Green Building <br /> As required by the City's Green Building Ordinance, the proposed project is required to qualify <br /> for at least 50 points on BuildltGreen's GreenPoint Rated Multifamily Checklist. The applicant <br /> has proposed to incorporate green building measures into Site 1 that allow the project to <br /> qualify for 77 points and 76 points for Site 2. Some of the proposed green building measures <br /> include: installing water-efficient toilets, urinals, shower heads, and faucets; using recycled <br /> flyash in the concrete mix; installing Energy Star® appliances; using FSC-certified wood; <br /> installing gearless elevators (use less energy and do not require lubricating oils); utilizing zero <br /> or low volatile organic compound (VOC) emitting paints and adhesives; and using <br /> PUD-85-08-12D, PUD-81-30-86D, and P11-0856 Planning Commission <br /> 18 of 25 <br />