My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
030717
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2017 3:00:33 PM
Creation date
3/1/2017 9:51:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
it must make the finding that the Negative Declaration is appropriate prior to making a <br /> recommendation to the City Council. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> Staff believes that the site designs are appropriate and efficient for these types of <br /> development. Staff feels that the applicant has included an adequate amount of usable open <br /> space and landscaped areas within the two projects given the site constraints and transit- <br /> oriented type of development. Staff feels that the building designs are attractive and that the <br /> architectural style, finish colors, and materials will complement the surrounding developments. <br /> The proposed projects would each provide 38 units that will be available to lower income <br /> households which would help the City to meet its lower income housing goals. <br /> STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> 1. Find that the projects would not have a significant effect on the environment and adopt a <br /> resolution recommending approval of the attached draft Mitigated Negative Declaration; <br /> 2. Adopt a resolution recommending approval to the City Council of the Development <br /> Agreement Amendment to extend the term of the Development Agreement to five years <br /> from the date of approval of the two Development Plans, filed as Case Nos. PUD-85-08- <br /> 12D and PUD-81-30-86D; and (b) incorporate approval of the development standards and <br /> design guidelines of the Hacienda Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Standards and <br /> Guidelines, filed as Case No. P11-0856. <br /> 3. Make the PUD findings for the proposed development plans as listed in the staff report; <br /> 4. Find that the exceptions to the Hacienda TOD Standards and Design Guidelines as listed in <br /> the staff report are appropriate for the two sites, and <br /> 5. Adopt resolutions recommending approval of PUD-85-08-12D and PUD-81-30-86D, <br /> development plan approval to construct two mixed-use, high-density residential/commercial <br /> developments, subject to the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit B-1 and Exhibit B-2, <br /> and forward the applications to the City Council for public hearing and review. <br /> Staff Planner: Natalie Amos,Associate Planner, 925.931.5613/namosQci.pleasanton.ca.us <br /> PUD-85-08-12D, PUD-81-30-86D, and P11-0856 Planning Commission <br /> 25 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.