My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
050217
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2017 4:14:35 PM
Creation date
4/27/2017 10:20:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/2/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18
Document Relationships
18 ATTACHMENT 08
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
18 ATTACHMENT 09
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
18 ATTACHMENT 12
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ponderosa Homes at 6900 Valley Trails Drive <br /> Initial Study and Negative Declaration <br /> (CMP) analysis is not required. Therefore, the project impact would be less <br /> than significant. <br /> c) The project site is located 5 miles from the closest airport and therefore would <br /> not interfere with air traffic patterns nor increase air traffic levels. Therefore, <br /> the project would have no impact. <br /> d-e) The project's streets and emergency vehicle access roads have been <br /> designed to City standards and would provide adequate sight distances to <br /> accommodate the safe turning radius of emergency vehicles and passenger <br /> vehicles entering and existing driveways. Therefore, the potential impact <br /> would be less than significant. <br /> f) The project may incrementally increase the use of bus transit, but would not <br /> conflict with or decrease the performance of the existing transit system. It <br /> would fill in gaps in the sidewalk network and support extensions to the existing <br /> trail system, consistent with the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, adopted <br /> in 2010, as well as the draft plan being updated in 2017. Therefore, the project <br /> would not conflict with adopted City policies supporting alternative <br /> transportation and the potential impact would be less than significant. <br /> 5.17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Impact With Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> Would the project: <br /> a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X <br /> applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? <br /> b) Require or result in the construction of new water or X <br /> wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of <br /> existing facilities, the construction of which could <br /> cause significant environmental effects? <br /> c) Require or result in the construction of new storm X <br /> water drainage facilities or expansion of existing <br /> facilities, the construction of which could cause <br /> significant environmental effects? <br /> d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the X <br /> project from existing entitlements and resources, or <br /> are new or expanded entitlements needed? <br /> 43 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.