My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENT 09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
050217
>
18 ATTACHMENT 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2017 12:20:19 PM
Creation date
4/28/2017 12:16:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/2/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACHMENT 9
Document Relationships
18
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
18 ATTACHMENT 08
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
278
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Arborist Report Revised February 1.2017. Hort Science, Inc. <br /> The Village at Valley Trails. Ponderosa Homes Page 1 <br /> Introduction and Overview <br /> Ponderosa Homes is proposing to redevelop the Valley Trails Church site, located on <br /> Valley Trails Dr, in Pleasanton CA. Current site use consists of the church,a parking lot <br /> and landscaping in the southwest corner of the site and an open field on the remainder. <br /> Ponderosa Homes requested that HortScience, Inc prepare an Arborist Report for the <br /> site. This report provides the following information: <br /> This report provides the following information: <br /> 1 An evaluation of the health and structural condition of the trees within the <br /> proposed project area based on a visual inspection from the ground. <br /> 2. An assessment of the development impacts to the trees based on the drawings <br /> provided by Ponderosa Homes. <br /> 3. Guidelines for tree preservation during the design,construction and maintenance <br /> phases of development. <br /> 4. A Tree Assessment Form,providing a description of each tree and a Tree <br /> Assessment Map showing the location of trees by tag number. <br /> Assessment Methods <br /> Trees#223—247 were assessed on February 13, 2015;trees#248—260 in February <br /> 2017 The assessment included all trees 6"and larger in diameter,within and adjacent to <br /> the proposed project The assessment procedure consisted of the following steps: <br /> 1. Identifying the tree as to species, <br /> 2. Tagging each tree with a numerically coded metal tag and recording its <br /> location on a map: <br /> 3 Measuring the trunk diameter at a point 54"above grade: <br /> 4. Evaluating the health and structural condition using a scale of 1 —5: <br /> 5-A healthy,vigorous tree, reasonably free of signs and symptoms of <br /> disease,with good structure and form typical of the species. <br /> 4-Tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback,minor <br /> structural defects that could be corrected. <br /> 3-Tree with moderate vigor, moderate twig and small branch dieback, <br /> thinning of crown,poor leaf color, moderate structural defects that <br /> might be mitigated with regular care. <br /> 2-Tree in decline,epicormic growth, extensive dieback of medium to large <br /> branches,significant structural defects that cannot be abated. <br /> -Tree in severe decline,dieback of scaffold branches and/or trunk;most <br /> of foliage from epicormics;extensive structural defects that cannot be <br /> abated. <br /> 5. Rating the suitability for preservation as"high","moderate"or"low". <br /> Suitability for preservation considers the invasiveness of the species,health, <br /> age and structural condition of the tree, and its potential to remain an asset <br /> to the site. <br /> Eleven(11)trees were located off-site but portions of canopies extended into the <br /> development site. Trees#234 and 243 may be on the property line. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.