My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENT 09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
050217
>
18 ATTACHMENT 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2017 12:20:19 PM
Creation date
4/28/2017 12:16:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/2/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACHMENT 9
Document Relationships
18
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
18 ATTACHMENT 08
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
278
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Arborist Report. Revised February 1.2017. HortScience, Inc. <br /> The Village at Valley Trails. Ponderosa Homes. Page 6 <br /> The project will demolish the existing curb and replace the sidewalk across the frontage. <br /> Sweetgums#248—260 are located between the curb and sidewalk. I recommend <br /> removing and replacing these trees for three reasons. First, tree suitability for <br /> preservation is generally low due to poor vigor and defects in tree structure. Second, <br /> trees will adversely impacted by demolition,grading and construction. Third,sweetgum <br /> is not good choice for the planting space The species is well-known for producing large <br /> surface roots that displace nearby pavement. The sidewalk has already been replaced in <br /> a large section of the project. There is every reason to expect that displacement will <br /> continue to occur in the future. <br /> Based on my evaluation of the plans,I recommend preservation of 12 trees(4 Heritage) <br /> and removal of 26(1 Heritage)(Table 3). Trees#245 and 247 are off-site but portions of <br /> their canopies extend into the project site. Some pruning to reduce the overhanging <br /> canopy will be required and is expected to be within the tolerance of the trees. Any <br /> pruning of off-site trees should be performed with the property owner's permission. <br /> Recommendations for tree preservation are predicated on adherence to the Tree <br /> Preservation Guidelines(following section). <br /> Estimate of Value <br /> The City of Pleasanton requires that the value of trees on development sites be <br /> estimated. To establish the value of the surveyed trees, I employed the standard <br /> methods found in Guide for Plant Appraisal.9th edition(published in 2000 by the <br /> International Society of Arboriculture, Savoy IL). In addition. I referred to Species <br /> Classification and Group Assignment(2004),a publication of the Western Chapter of <br /> the International Society of Arboriculture. These two documents outline the methods <br /> employed in tree appraisal. <br /> The value of Landscape trees is based upon four factors: size,species,condition and <br /> location. Size is measured as trunk diameter, normally 54"above grade. The species <br /> factor considers the adaptability and appropriateness of the plant in the East Bay area. <br /> The Species Classification and Group Assignment lists recommended species ratings <br /> and evaluations. Condition reflects the health and structural integrity of the individual. <br /> The location factor considers the site,placement and contribution of the tree in its <br /> surrounding landscape. In this case,trees were located in a well maintained residential <br /> part of Pleasanton. <br /> The estimated value of the 12 trees recommended for preservation was$33,900;for 26 <br /> trees recommended for removal,$33.400(Table 3). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.