Laserfiche WebLink
Location Ma.: The Villa•a at Valle Trails PUD-113) <br /> • <br /> Valley Trails . <br /> P elghborbood . <br /> P r 4 <br /> r'I <br /> Because this property exceeds the fifteen (15) unit threshold, it is subject to the City's 20% <br /> affordability requirement for very low, low, and/or moderate income households (i.e., provide <br /> 7.2 affordably priced units in the development), or to satisfy the requirement through an <br /> alternative means. Alternatives described in the ordinance include options such as off-site <br /> development, land dedication and payment of the Lower Income Housing Fee. Historically, the <br /> City has taken a flexible approach to negotiating how residential projects may meet their <br /> affordable housing requirement. In addition to affordable units being provided on-site (such as <br /> in the higher density "Vines" and "Andares" developments), affordable housing fee payments <br /> and land dedication have also been accepted. A copy of the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance is <br /> included for reference as Attachment 2. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> Most Below Market Rate (BMR) ownership homes have been duets, townhomes, multi-family <br /> or smaller, detached single-family units of approximately 1,200 sf. There are no larger single- <br /> family BMR homes in the City's inventory and staff and the City Council have traditionally not <br /> pursued that type due to the significant gap between the market sales price of the homes and <br /> sales prices which are affordable for low and moderate income households. For example, <br /> using the current median list price per square foot for homes in Pleasanton of $478, a 2,500 sf <br /> single family home would be priced at approximately $1.19 million. The mortgage that a low <br /> income household of four could afford (at 80% of Area Median Income) would be <br /> approximately $270,000. The significant subsidy gap creates a "windfall" perception for <br /> individual homeowners, does not maximize affordable housing goals which may serve more <br /> residents through other housing development opportunities and programs, and is economically <br /> infeasible. Historically, developments with larger single family units such as Ruby Hill, and <br /> most recently Lund Ranch, have provided fee payments in lieu of providing units on site. <br /> These fee payments have been an important funding source for affordable housing goals at <br /> other sites, including Kottinger Gardens, and in funding programs which support the variety of <br /> Housing Element goals. <br /> Page - 2 - <br />