Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />of <br />THE MEETING <br />of <br />THE CITY COUNCIL <br />Pleasanton, California <br />December 20, 1965 <br />THE CITY COUNCIL met in Regular Session on the above date with Mayor Long presiding. <br />BOLL CALL by the City Clerk evidenced the following attendance: Councilmen Bubics, <br />Gerton, Harding, McWilliams and Mayor Long were present. Mr. Fales, City Manager; <br />Mr. Struthers, City Attorney; Mr. Campbell, City Engineer; and Mrs. Woodward, City <br />Clerk, were present. <br />PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG was led by Mayor Long. <br />MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL. No one <br />addressed the Chair. <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />Appeal of Devmar. Inc.. 268 Grand Ave., Oakland, from an Adverse Decision of the <br />Planning Commission in Denying an Application for an Amendment to Ord. No. 309 <br />Rezonin: A .roximatel 94 Acres Located East of Santa Rita Road Between Mohr Ave. <br />and the Kaiser private road, from the A District to the R -1 District <br />Mayor Long declared the Public Hearing on the above matter open. <br />Mr. Fales read the report, dated November 19, 1965, from Livingston and Blayney <br />which indicated that the City of Pleasanton is confronted with a need to provide a <br />balance between residential and industrial land use and with the unknown time of <br />the development of the San Francisco Industrial property, it would not be economi- <br />cally feasible to grant R -1 zoning to this particular property at this time. <br />Mr. Joe McDevitt, representing Devmar, Inc., stated that the possibility of an <br />industry developing the entire 94 acres was very remote. <br />Mr. Ted Fairfield, MacKay Somps, stated that this property would be difficult to <br />develop as an industrial unit as the utility requirements are too costly. <br />Mr. Fales stated that utilities would not be a problem and that he has been informer <br />by industrial planners that this property could be developed as an industrial unit. <br />The City Clerk reported that there had been no written public hearing communications <br />received. <br />After considerable discussion, it was moved by Councilman McWilliams and seconded <br />by Councilman Harding that the public hearing be closed. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Bubics, Gerton, Harding, McWilliams and Mayor Long <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />It was moved by Councilman McWilliams and seconded by Councilman Gerton that the <br />final decision on the appeal of Devmar, Inc., be delayed approximately ninety days. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />Councilmen Bubics, Gerton, Harding, McWilliams and Mayor Long <br />None <br />None <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS were not scheduled for this meeting. <br />REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER <br />Proposed New City Seal <br />Mr. Paul Carey, of Logan, Carey and Rehag, designers of the proposed new City Seal, <br />discussed the seal and presented several sketches of a seal which he felt were <br />inferior to the seal he presented originally. <br />The City Council decided to postpone this matter. <br />Acceptance of Public Improvements; Tract No. 2680 (Pleasanton Valley Unit No. 3) <br />Mr. Fales indicated that Tract No. 2680 is now complete, final inspections have <br />been made, all required bonds have been submitted and it is now ready for acceptance- <br />It was moved by Councilman McWilliams and seconded by Councilman Gerton that Reso- <br />lution No. 65 -203, accepting the public improvements in Tract No. 2680, Pleasanton <br />Valley Unit No. 3, be adopted. <br />