|
Types of Streets
<br />Boulevards a major divided thoroughfare
<br />Avenue a secondary undivided throughfare
<br />Road or Street a collector type street, direct route
<br />Drive a minor residential or winding scenic type of collector
<br />street, an indirect route
<br />a minor residential or shor connecting street
<br />Circle a minor residential street with both ends connecting to
<br />the same collector street
<br />Court Cul -de -sac, not a through street.
<br />The name of the street should not conflict, or create a difficult
<br />phrase to pronounce, when used with the street designations listed
<br />above.
<br />Temporary Designations
<br />If a street is planned to be extended sometime in the indefinite
<br />future, it whould be labeled "Not a Through Street
<br />If it is reasonably certain that a street that is stubbed off will not
<br />be extended for a period of three years or more, it should be designat-
<br />ed as a "Court".
<br />It was moved by Councilman McWilliams and seconded by Councilman Cairo that Resolut-
<br />ion No. 65 -119, adopting the street name policy as recommended by the Planning Com-
<br />mission by report dated July 16, 1965, be adopted.
<br />The roll call vote was as follows:
<br />AYES: Councilmen Bubics, Cairo, Harding, McWilliams and Mayor Long
<br />NOES: None
<br />ABSENT: None
<br />REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER
<br />Annexation Agreement; Annexation No. 39, "Lynnewood Annex"
<br />Mr. Fales indicated that the above agreement has been executed by the property owners
<br />and requested authorization for the City officers to execute this agreement.
<br />It was moved by Councilman Harding and seconded by Councilman McWilliams that Res-
<br />olution No. 65 -120, authorizing execution of the Annexation Agreement for Annexation
<br />No. 39, Lynnewood Annex, be adopted.
<br />The roll call vote was as follows:
<br />AYES: Councilmen Bubics, Cairo, Harding, McWilliams and Mayor Long
<br />NOES: None
<br />ABSENT: None
<br />Progress Payment No. 8; Leo F. Piazza Paving Co. Assessment District No. 64 -2
<br />Mr. Fales stated that progress payment No. 8 to Leo F. Piazza Paving Co. was now duo
<br />and payable in the amount of $60,628.34 for public improvements in Vintage Hills,
<br />Units No. 2, 3, and 4.
<br />It was moved by Councilman Harding and seconded by Councilman McWilliams that Res-
<br />olution No. 65 -121, authorizing progress payment No. 8, to Leo F. Piazza Paving Co.
<br />in the amount of $60,628.34 for public improvements in Vintage Hills, Unit No. 2, 3,
<br />and 4, be adopted.
<br />The roll call vote was as follows:
<br />AYES: Councilmen Bubics, Cairo, Harding, McWilliams and Mayor Long
<br />NOES: None
<br />ABSENT: None
<br />Progress Payment No. 2; E. E. Pestana, Inc. Assessment District No. 64 -3
<br />Mr. Fales indicated that progress payment No. 2 to E. E. Pestana, Inc., was now due
<br />and payable in the amount of $17,914.90 for installation of the Arroyo del Valle
<br />interceptor sewer, Assessment District No. 64 -3.
<br />It was moved by Councilman Cairo and and seconded by Councilman McWilliams that Res-
<br />olution No. 65 -122, authorizing progress payment No. 2 in the amount of $17,914.90
<br />to E. E. Pestana, Inc. for installation of the Arroyo del Valle interceptor sewer,
<br />Assessment District No. 64 -3, be adopted.
<br />The roll call Vote was as follows:
<br />AYES: Councilmen Bubics, Cairo, Harding, McWilliams and Mayor Long
<br />NOES: None
<br />ABSENT: None
<br />Acceptance of Public Improvements; Tract No. 2711, Amador Estates
<br />Mr. Fales stated that the public improvements in the above tract are complete, ex-
<br />cepting for some minor details to be covered by a cash bond.
<br />
|