My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062415
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 062415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:49:59 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:39:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/24/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
b. P15 -0331. Rex and Jean Shoemake <br />Application for Administrative Design Review approval to construct an <br />approximately 324 - square -foot, 14 -foot tall detached patio cover in the <br />rear yard of the property located at 5082 Crestwood Court. Zoning for <br />the property is R -1 -6,500 (One - Family Residential) District. <br />Adam Weinstein, in Natalie Amos' absence, presented the staff report and described <br />the scope, layout, and key elements of the project. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if the Noise Ordinance of the Municipal Code also <br />governs noise created by human voices at 60 dBA as it does for amplified noise. <br />Mr. Weinstein replied that he thinks that generally speaking, human voices are not <br />governed by that standard. <br />Commissioner Balch referred to the case of the Masons. <br />Mr. Weinstein agreed that this was an issue that came up in the case of the Millers and <br />the Masons. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that this also came up in the discussion of the play area <br />behind Raley's. He recalled that the Commission was very concerned about human <br />voices, and it was one of the reasons the application was denied. <br />Mr. Weinstein stated that there has been a debate about the language of that specific <br />provision in the Municipal Code, and generally speaking, human voices had been <br />excluded from that threshold. He noted that things like televisions, dogs barking, lawn <br />mowers, leaf blowers, and those sorts of things could exceed that threshold, but not <br />human voices. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that the reason he asked is because when the <br />Municipal Code says that "no person shall produce ..." it then says, "or allow to be <br />produced by any machine..." so it sounds like if that latter phrase is removed, it does <br />say "no person shall produce on residential property any noise levels...... He inquired if <br />human voices congregating are a concern of the neighbors. <br />Ms. Harryman stated that she does not actually know how Pleasanton police officers <br />interpret this and how they enforce it. She indicated that this fortunately does not come <br />up often. She noted that she could read this either way, for example, if it had another <br />comma elsewhere, and would then have a more definitive answer; but like the <br />Commission, she is struggling with whether human voices alone are enough. She <br />further noted that she read it one way the first time and then read it more closely and <br />read it the other way. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if the clause would be governed by how the <br />Pleasanton Police Department enforces it. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 24, 2015 Page 48 of 54 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.