Laserfiche WebLink
STONERIDGE DRIVE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENUSTAPLES RANCH PROJECT <br />MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN [May 20101 <br />Date Completed/ <br />Mitigation Measures/Improvement Measures <br />Monitoring Action <br />Responsibility"' J" i" <br />Timing <br />Signature <br />The applicable standard for LOS will be that established by each local <br />agency for its current jurisdictional area and its sphere of influence. If <br />spheres of influence overlap or jurisdiction over an intersection is split <br />between two local agencies, the standard to be achieved by mitigation, <br />where feasible, will be determined by mutual agreement of the <br />jurisdictions involved. <br />The City of Pleasanton is willing to ensure that projects it approves <br />contribute fair share mitigation cost for improvements in other <br />jurisdictions but only if the other jurisdictions are also willing to <br />reciprocate for projects within their jurisdictions that contribute <br />considerably to traffic occurring within the City of Pleasanton. The <br />strategy also may allocate mitigation responsibility to each jurisdiction for <br />improvements within its jurisdiction on the understanding that each <br />jurisdiction will be addressing the cumulative contributions from projects <br />in neighboring jurisdictions. <br />If a mutually agreeable strategy cannot be reached with the City of <br />Livermore, City of Dublin and Alameda County, or any one of them, then <br />the City of Pleasanton will not require the contribution of mitigations for <br />contributions to impacts in any other jurisdiction unwilling to agree to <br />reciprocity, within the City of Pleasanton. This is because, under such <br />circumstances, the City could not be assured that projects it approves are <br />being assessed for mitigation only in proportion to their impact and <br />because the City may need to require reallocation of the mitigation <br />contribution to intersections and roadway segments within Pleasanton <br />itself, lacking assurance of mitigation funding from projects that may be <br />approved by other jurisdictions. In the event that a mutually agreed upon <br />strategy is not reached, then mitigation of the Project's contribution to the <br />impacted intersection or roadway segment would be infeasible, and the <br />47 <br />