Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF PLEASANTON Page 6 of 12 <br /> TRANSITION PLAN July 28, 2004 <br /> Updated February 1, 2008 <br /> ACCESSIBILITY EVALUATION <br /> The City of Pleasanton retained Rolf Jensen & Associates, Inc. to assist in performing <br /> an accessibility evaluation of City public facilities. The evaluation included a visual <br /> survey of the buildings and a review of the building layouts and resulted in the <br /> Accessibility Evaluation Report. The intent of the evaluation was to identify features in <br /> the buildings and sites which do not comply with the accessibility requirements of the <br /> Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and when applicable, the more stringent, <br /> California Building Code (CBC). This process began in early 2002, and is the basis for <br /> this Transition Plan and how the City will comply with the ADA/Section 504. <br /> Since preparation of the Accessibility Evaluation, the City has made numerous facility <br /> improvements to address these issues and continues to fund accessibility <br /> improvements through it Facilities Renovation Fund and facility remodel and <br /> expansions. <br /> The main portion of the Accessibility Evaluation Report contains information regarding <br /> requirements for new construction, alterations and additions, and information regarding <br /> the removal of barriers for existing buildings. The report includes a summary of the <br /> overall accessibility of each building, and a summary of the applicable codes. <br /> In an effort to effectively meet ADA standards, the City, in evaluating and addressing <br /> the deficiencies, has created priorities for implementing improvements. The basis for the <br /> priorities is taken from the information relating to Title III/Public Accommodations. In <br /> conformance with Title III, public priorities have been developed to accommodate <br /> building areas that deal with, or provide goods and services to, the general public. <br /> Other parts of the building, such as those associated only with employee areas, have a <br /> lower priority in part because under Title II and III, these areas are not required to <br /> address the removal of barriers, but are required to comply with Title I/Employment <br /> requirements. The priorities also consider budgetary constraints and are intended to <br /> help the City evaluate and develop a program for compliance with the ADA. <br />