Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1of12 <br /> SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT,RELEASE AND COVENANT NOT TO SUE <br /> This Settlement Agreement,Release and Covenant Not to Sue ("Agreement") is entered <br /> into,by and among the following persons and entities: <br /> 1. CANYON CREEK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit <br /> mutual benefit corporation, on behalf of itself and as standing is conferred upon it <br /> by California Code of Civil Procedure sections 383, and its Declaration of <br /> Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, Articles of Incorporation and/or Bylaws <br /> ("ASSOCIATION"), and <br /> 2. PACWEST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, PLEASANT CREEK <br /> DEVELOPMENT, J.CARTER WITT III(collectively referred to as "PACWEST"), <br /> 3. DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY aka DEVELOPERS <br /> INSURANCE COMPANY ("DEVELOPERS"); and, <br /> 4. CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> Without admitting liability or any obligation whatsoever, the parties to this <br /> Agreement desire to settle any and all claims between them relating to the Agreement as defined <br /> herein. <br /> RECITALS <br /> A. The parties to this Agreement have been or may be involved in various claims and <br /> disputes arising out of or connected with residential properties in Pleasanton, Alameda County, <br /> California,commonly known as Canyon Creek, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A" <br /> attached to this Agreement("Property"). <br /> B. All those various claims and disputes are at issue in that certain action number <br /> V-018334-5,pending in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda, (the <br /> "Court"), entitled Canyon Creek of Pleasanton v. Pacwest Development, et al. (the "Action"). <br /> This Agreement is made and entered into by and among the parties hereto to formalize termination <br /> of their involvement in the Action. <br /> C. The parties to this Agreement desire to resolve all aspects of the Action that <br /> SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, MUTUAL RELEASE AND COVENANT NOT TO SUE <br /> Canyon Creek of Pleasanton v. Pacwest Development, et al. <br />