My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
26
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
041619
>
26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2019 1:06:35 PM
Creation date
4/10/2019 1:06:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Item 3—Redlined Plan, Part 2 <br /> Question for Task Force <br /> 7. Does the Task Force agree that restaurants with indoor dining be permitted, <br /> restaurants with outdoor dining be subject to a Minor Conditional Use permit, and <br /> that bars be subject to a Conditional Use Permit in the Mixed Use — Transitional <br /> district? <br /> 8. If so, should outdoor dining be subject to both Minor Conditional Use and <br /> Outdoor Dining permits? <br /> Existing Single Family Residences <br /> Within the Mixed Use — Transitional district, particularly along the north side of Old <br /> Bernal Avenue, there are existing single family residences. While the long-term <br /> objective of the Mixed Use — Transitional district is for these properties to potentially be <br /> redeveloped with context-sensitive mixed use development, owners of these single <br /> family homes may desire to keep and improve their properties. Given the ultimate <br /> objective for redevelopment, single family residences would not be identified as <br /> permitted (or conditional uses) for the Mixed Use — Transitional district, and accordingly, <br /> would be considered non-conforming uses.3 In order to allow these residences to not <br /> only remain, but to allow for alterations and expansions, staff proposes that the existing <br /> municipal code section pertinent to non-conforming structures be expanded to include <br /> the Mixed Use — Transitional district. The redlined specific plan also includes a policy <br /> that indicates existing residential uses may remain, and may be remodeled or enlarged. <br /> A municipal code amendment to section 18.120.030(A), adding the Mixed Use — <br /> Transitional to the list of districts that allow a residential use to be altered or enlarged, <br /> could be added as an implementation item if the Task Force agrees with this approach. <br /> Question for Task Force <br /> 9. Does the Task Force agree that owners of existing single family homes in the <br /> Mixed Use — Transitional district should be able to alter or enlarge the home, and <br /> that an implementation action to amend municipal code section 18.20.030(A), <br /> Nonconforming Uses— Alteration and Addition, should be added to the specific <br /> plan such that the Mixed Use — Transitional is added to the list of districts that <br /> allow a residential use to be altered or enlarged? <br /> Active Ground Floor Uses <br /> The Task Force has discussed and generally supported the concept of active ground <br /> floor uses at previous Task Force meetings. Accordingly, text for active ground floor <br /> uses has been added to the specific plan. Upon further consideration of this topic, the <br /> redline specific plan also includes text related to multi-use spaces and exceptions to the <br /> requirement. <br /> 3 Pleasanton Municipal Code Section 18.120.040 indicates that non-conforming dwelling units are not <br /> required to be changed to a conforming use if abandoned or discontinued for a continuous period <br /> exceeding 90 days, as is required for all other non-conforming uses. <br /> Prepared for the April 24, 2018 Downtown Specific Plan Update Task Force Meeting Page 10 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.