3_Exhibits A & C-F - Laserfiche WebLink

row of trees to be planted in the landscape strip between the driveway and adjacent property. These are currently shown as oak trees; staff has discussed this to ensure the planting is of sufficient size to maintain healthy growing trees to screen the property. Commissioner Brown referred to the landscape plan and stated it shows seven 15-gallon Canyon Oak trees proposed between the two properties. Commissioner Pace inquired and confirmed that the front home is proposed to face Stanley Boulevard and not the other two homes which are proposed to face the driveway. If they were to switch the driveway to the other side of the property on the west side, it would put the homes against the back of the property. Ms. Hagen said if the plan was flipped, the first floor would have an approximate 10-foot setback and the second floor would be 15 feet, whereas as currently designed, it is set back on 30 to 35 feet depending on the lot. Lot 1 and 2 are setback further but Lot 3 has the porch closer, which is still 30 feet from the adjacent property. Commissioner Pace asked if there will also be trees that are 15-gallon or greater in between the two properties. Ms. Hagen confirmed that would be the case. Mr. Beaudin responded that the trees are 15-gallon potted trees which are somewhat small, so the Commission may consider asking that larger sized trees be planted to help create privacy initially versus over time as they mature. Commissioner Pace inquired about the City's internal traffic plan review process. Ms. Hagen responded that all departments have received and reviewed the plans, including Traffic Engineering, which has concluded there would not be any negligible impacts associated with this project that are not covered with the new improvements along Stanley Boulevard. Mr. Beaudin added that California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is a requirement and as an infill project, this is consistent with zoning, and an additional traffic study is not required for a subdivision of this size. Commissioner Brown inquired about the orientation of the windows and height of the proposed homes as currently presented in the plans. Ms. Hagen said the current orientation and heights of the proposed homes are permitted within the PUD. If any changes were made above 10 feet in height then it must go through staff review and an administrative design review process, and neighbors would be notified. Commissioner Ritter inquired whether the zoning has changed over the past five years. Ms. Hagen responded the current zoning has been in place for more than the past five years, prior to when the PUD was submitted. Commissioner Brown asked if the heritage home next door was also zoned PUD-HDR. Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, June 12, 2019 Page 3 of 5 acent property, and staff will require a Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, June 12, 2019 Page 2 of 5 ng and home designs including architecture, colors, and materials? Conclusion Discussion Point#3 3. What other information would assist the Commission in its decision on the proposal? Do you have any other comments on the project? PUD-133, 3987 Stanley Boulevard Planning Commission 10 of 11 any items it wishes to be addressed before the project application is formally presented to the Planning Commission. The first two questions below are topical PUD-133, 3987 Stanley Boulevard Planning Commission 9 of 11 s equipment, oil, gas, chemicals, harmful materials, fill or storage. PUD-133 Planning Commission Page 17 of 18 rading or subdivision permit, whichever occurs first. The City will retain the cash deposit until all work is substantially complete, all areas are stabilized, and all hazards are mitigated to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering/City Engineer. PUD-133 Planning Commission Page 13 of 18 Page 12 of 18 S: The applicant's California licensed geotechnical engineer shall inspect and approve the PUD-133 Planning Commission Page 9 of 18