3_Exhibits A & C-F - Laserfiche WebLink

Exhibit D, Project Comparison Chart Site 1.) Subject Property— 2.) CA Reflections 3.) Irby Ranch 4.) Ponderosa 5.) Country Roads, Development Standard PUD-133 Homes Rachael Place Gyles Place Zoning PUD-HDR PUD-MDR PUD-HDR PUD-MDR PUD-HDR Overall Project 14,400 sq. ft. (.33 acres) 17 acres 11.01 acres (13.71 acres 1.84 acres 2.6 acres Size including Arroyo) Number of Units 3 109 93 12 39 Density 9 6.4 8.4 7.1 15 Typical Lot Size 4,400—5,440 gross sq. ft. 3,600 sq. ft. 2,391 sq. ft. 3,715— 9,878 ft. N/A 2,860—4,560 net sq. ft. (townhome/condominium) Unit Size 1,635-1,937 sq. ft. (2-story) 1,079 sq. ft. (1-story) 2,359 sq. ft. (2-story) 2,226-2,624 sq. ft. 937-1,448 sq. ft. 1,612 sq. ft. (2-story) 2,294 sq. ft. (3-story) Floor Area Ratio 44% - 139% 30-43% (gross) N/A 43-58% (net) 17.34% -45.34% Average 87.5% (2-story) 45%-71% (townhome/condominium) Average 116.5% (3-story) 25 ft. - 27 ft. 3 in. (2-story) 19 ft. 6 in. (1-story) 26 ft. 10 in. (2-story) 25 ft. 9 in. —30 ft. 8 in. Building Height (2 story) 25 ft. (2-story) 25 ft. (2-story) 35 ft. (3-story) Setbacks Front Stanley Boulevard: Stanley Boulevard: 11 —29 ft. 13' to porch, 18' to home Nevada Street: 6— 10 ft. Stanley Boulevard: 8' Stanley Boulevard: 23' Back of internal 13—20 ft. Interior Streets: 8— 15 ft. to porch, 13' to home Back of internal sidewalk: Interior Courtyards: 6— 11 ft. sidewalk: 2' 2' to porch, 7' to homes Side 5 ft. for single story 5 ft. 7.5 ft. for two-story 3 feet 3 inches 5 ft. 10 ft. between buildings elements Rear Home: 15 ft. (2-story) Garage to street: 2 ft. Garage: 10 ft. 20 ft. min. Homes on Lots 10-16, 92, 10 ft. 10 ft. and 93: 8 ft. 1 Estimated height based on scaled renderings.As-built building permits were unavailable. the zoning of the current neighborhood. Discussion Point 3: What other information would assist the Commission in its decision on the proposal? Do you have any other comments on the project? Commissioner Brown referenced story poles as mentioned in the Agenda Report and wanted to see the design with the inclusion of story poles. He referenced the discussion surrounding lack of privacy presented during public comment and said he would like to see the applicant look at window placement and consider larger trees to address neighbors' privacy concerns, but could not see anything non-compliant and was open to modifications after looking at the story poles. Commissioner Pace had no additional comments in relation to Discussion Point 3. Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, June 12, 2019 Page 4 of 5 decision on the proposal? Do you have any other comments on the project? PUD-133, 3987 Stanley Boulevard Planning Commission 10 of 11 any items it wishes to be addressed before the project application is formally presented to the Planning Commission. The first two questions below are topical PUD-133, 3987 Stanley Boulevard Planning Commission 9 of 11 s equipment, oil, gas, chemicals, harmful materials, fill or storage. PUD-133 Planning Commission Page 17 of 18 rading or subdivision permit, whichever occurs first. The City will retain the cash deposit until all work is substantially complete, all areas are stabilized, and all hazards are mitigated to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering/City Engineer. PUD-133 Planning Commission Page 13 of 18 Page 12 of 18 S: The applicant's California licensed geotechnical engineer shall inspect and approve the PUD-133 Planning Commission Page 9 of 18