Laserfiche WebLink
Page 6 PUD-105 and P14-0852 <br /> July 9, 2019 <br /> JDEDZ <br /> The amount of energy used would represent an insubstantial fraction of the region's available energy supply and <br /> capacity. The JDEDZ would be consistent with energy efficiency standards in the applicable Title 24 Energy <br /> Efficiency Standards for Nonresidential Buildings and the Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, <br /> referred to as the California Green Building Standards(CALGreen)Code and include electric vehicle supply <br /> equipment(EVSE)to promote transportation energy efficiency. Additionally,the Costco warehouse would be <br /> designed to include solar at the time of opening which would reduce its consumption of electricity provided by <br /> PG&E. <br /> Because the JDEDZ would be consistent with energy efficient building standards and promote transportation <br /> energy efficiency,it would not result in the wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy or <br /> preclude opportunities for improving overall fuel efficiency and future energy conservation. The JDEDZ <br /> project also would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy <br /> efficiency. As a result,operational energy impacts would be considered less than significant. <br /> Economic Impact Analysis <br /> The Economic Impact Analysis prepared by ALH Economics,was circulated for public comment as part of the <br /> Draft SEIR in 2015. No changes have been made to the Economic Impact Analysis; however; the City has <br /> agreed to recirculate this analysis for additional public comment pursuant to a request from the Petitioners. <br /> As a refresher,the Economic Impact Analysis indicates that impacts generated by the JDEDZ on the market <br /> area's'existing retail environment would be limited The Economic Analysis projects that Phase I sales in the <br /> JDEDZ(i.e., the sales resulting from a club retail use and a limited amount of general retail uses) could result in <br /> a decrease in annual sales by existing market retailers of approximately $26.7 million, or 0.9 percent of the <br /> market area's existing$3 billion in annual retail sales,which is a nominal impact. <br /> The proposed JDEDZ's effect on the local economy is projected to be focused in three specific retail categories: <br /> gasoline stations, home furnishings and appliances,and food and beverages. In the first two categories(gasoline <br /> stations, and home furnishings and appliances), sales within the JDEDZ would amount to a combined 1.1 <br /> percent or less of existing market area sales, which would not be considered substantial when spread among the <br /> numerous gas stations and home furnishing and appliance stores in the market area. While food and beverage <br /> sales within the JDEDZ would amount to 7.4 percent of existing market sales,the new market demand alone <br /> generated between now and buildout of the JDEDZ would be sufficient to recompense existing businesses for <br /> these potentially diverted sales. Accounting for the fact that sales diverted from existing stores to a club retail <br /> use would be widely dispersed among numerous supermarkets, ethnic food stores,and other small food markets <br /> (rather than concentrated in a single store or small number of stores),there would be limited effects on existing <br /> food and beverage retailers. <br /> The Economic Impact Analysis also concludes that the JDEDZ would have no adverse economic effects on <br /> downtown businesses, primarily because downtown offers a unique and different shopping environment than a <br /> club retailer, and most downtown businesses sell goods that are quite different from those sold at club retailers. <br /> On the positive side,the economic study also notes that a Costco could generate enhanced visibility for existing <br /> businesses in the proposed JDEDZ, benefits associated with local availability of low-cost food and gas, and <br /> possible long-term increases in property values. <br /> 1 The"market area"for this study comprises 18 full census tracts and three partial census tracts spanning the City of Pleasanton,the majority of the City <br /> of Dublin,and some unincorporated Alameda County areas south of the City of Pleasanton and northwest of the City of Dublin.The market area was <br /> determined through review of drive times to the project site and the locations of other nearby club retail stores,with consideration also given to <br /> natural and man-made features,such as topography and freeway access. <br /> COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT— P. O. BOX 520, Pleasanton, CA 94566-0802 <br /> Planning Building&Safety Engineering Traffic Inspection <br /> 200 Old Bernal Ave. 200 Old Bernal Ave. 200 Old Bernal Ave. 200 Old Bernal Ave. 1S7 Main St. <br /> (925)931-5600 (925)931-5300 (925)931-5650 (925)931-5650 (925)931-5680 <br /> Fax: 931-5483 Fax: 931-5478 Fax: 931-5479 Fax: 931-5479 Fax: 931-5484 <br />