My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
042120
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2020 4:33:10 PM
Creation date
3/12/2020 10:13:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/21/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
Document Relationships
12 ATTACHMENT 3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\042120
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 5 <br /> PUD-89-06-08M, Gabriela Marks/Marks Architects, Inc. for Jinglebells LLC <br /> Application for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Modification approval to remove an <br /> existing PUD (PUD-89-6) condition of approval prohibiting a drive-through restaurant on "Pad <br /> B" within Phase III of the Rose Pavilion Shopping Center. The proposed modification would <br /> facilitate the demolition of an existing oil change facility and the construction of a new <br /> approximately 1,649-square-foot drive-through Taco Bell restaurant and related site <br /> improvements on "Pad B" located at 4210 Rosewood Drive. Zoning for the property is <br /> PUD-C (Planned Unit Development — Commercial) District. <br /> Associate Planner Eric Luchini presented the specifics of the item in the Agenda Report. <br /> Commissioner Pace requested background on the prohibition of drive-through use. <br /> Mr. Luchini stated it was unclear as to why the City Council imposed the condition. <br /> Commissioner Pace referenced the Starbucks in the Rose Pavilion shopping center and <br /> inquired about the condition and whether that was in place for the Starbucks location. <br /> Mr. Luchini responded that fast food restaurants typically had higher trip generation rates as <br /> opposed to a sit-down restaurant. He referenced the Climate Action Plan (CAP) and air quality <br /> measures and the reasons why the denial was being recommended versus what was allowed <br /> for Starbucks at the time. <br /> Commissioner Pace asked if a new CAP was in place. <br /> Mr. Luchini stated the existing CAP discussed efforts to reduce air quality impacts including <br /> walkability, but the new CAP was not complete. <br /> Vice Chair Brown asked for clarification pertaining to Starbucks and the PUD in question. <br /> Mr. Luchini confirmed that Phase 2 did not include a restriction on drive-throughs and the <br /> restriction in Phase 3 was enacted at the time of PUD creation. <br /> Commissioner Balch asked if staff recommended no new drive-throughs be permitted in town. <br /> Community Development Director Ellen Clark responded that there had not been a policy <br /> discussion as it relates to future drive-through locations in the City. <br /> Commissioner Balch discussed the zoning for the former Denny's site and the Chick-Fil-A, <br /> both located at Hopyard Road and Owens Drive, and clarified that the zoning would be <br /> straight-up zoned without its PUD. <br /> Mr. Luchini responded that Phase II of Rose Pavilion was straight zoned. <br /> Commissioner Pace questioned the rationale for why a portion of the shopping center was <br /> straight-zoned and why other phases were treated differently. <br /> Mr. Luchini stated he was not sure why the phases were different. <br /> Excerpt: Draft Planning Commission Minutes, January 22, 2020 Page 1 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.