My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
5_Exhibits A-G
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
05-27
>
5_Exhibits A-G
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2020 3:27:16 PM
Creation date
5/20/2020 3:26:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/27/2020
Document Relationships
5
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\05-27
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Proposed PUD-135 Lot 1 Building Restrictions with Comparisons <br /> Please see attached chart for details. <br /> In response to the Planning Commissioners' feedback, we propose the following building <br /> restrictions for Lot 1 to minimize the visual impact of the structures that will be built: <br /> 1. Require a 70 ft front setback. <br /> Neighboring Bridle Creek Homes have an average front setback of 43 ft. Agricultural lots <br /> normally have a 30 ft front setback. <br /> 2. Require a 60 ft side setback on the west side and 35 ft side setback on the east side, <br /> total of 95 ft combined. <br /> Neighboring Bridle Creek Homes have a minimum side setback of 5 ft on one side, total of 50 <br /> ft combined. The owner of Lot 1 may not build anything, including a pool, gazebo, etc. outside <br /> of the building envelope. With the creek at the rear of the lot, the owner really only has the side <br /> yard to use. Therefore, 60 ft would be the maximum reasonable side setback on the Dale Way <br /> side of the property. <br /> 3. Require that the second story of the home on Lot 1 be 40% of the sf of the first story. <br /> Neighboring Bridle Creek homes have no similar second story restriction. <br /> 4. Reduce FAR for Lot 1 to 15% or 5,180 sf+ 600 sf garage. <br /> Bridle Creek homes have a maximum 20%FAR+ 600 sf garage. At 0.79 ac, Lot 1 is 16% <br /> smaller than the average area of the Bridle Creek lots on Sycamore Rd, so one could argue that <br /> proportionately, Lot 1 should receive 16% less buildable square feet, but Lot 1 is receiving <br /> 37% less buildable square feet than its neighboring Bridle Creek homes. <br /> We understand that some may have a preference for a smaller home on Lot 1. However, it is <br /> important to note that the Bridle Creek homes along Sycamore Rd also have a wide trail <br /> encumbering their properties, so the trail on Dale Way should not be used to justify a reduction <br /> in FAR for Lot 1. <br /> To the casual observer, the creek will appear to be part of Lot 1. Per Staffs request, Lot 5 <br /> retains ownership of the creek but there will be an open wire fence dividing Lot 1 and Lot 5. So <br /> to those walking or driving by, it will feel open and the creek will appear as part of Lot 1 and thus <br /> it will seem larger than it actually is. The combined acreage for Lot 1 and Lot 5 is 2.27 acres, <br /> well above the two acre minimum for two agricultural lots. <br /> We have researched all related permits to provide the Planning Commission with an "apples to <br /> apples" comparison with the neighboring Bridle Creek homes. Please see the chart on the <br /> following page for details. <br /> Existing chain link fence I <br /> l <br /> \. �R\ora % within creek setback to s HTli', --`�"r <br /> O Existin Fence to remain 1,�,„�Nlc �-- <br /> / <br /> \ - k0---'-1 -----'—\”- <br /> _ —\ mxw- g remain'�\ ,4) \ -., ' <br /> T <br /> - —sy <br /> o - <br /> I I—I I I Feet <br />asible, the applicant shall submit a report from a certified <br /> arborist acceptable to the City indicating trenching will not be detrimental to the health of <br /> the tree. <br /> c. Nothing may be stored within the dripline of the tree canopies. This includes equipment, <br /> oil, gas, chemicals, harmful materials, fill or storage. <br /> d. No oil, gasoline, chemicals, or other harmful materials shall be deposited or disposed <br /> within the dripline of the trees or in drainage channels, swales, or areas that may lead to <br /> the dripline. <br /> e. No sign, wires, or ropes shall be attached to the trees. <br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and VTM 8528 Planning Commission <br /> 990 Sycamore Road <br /> Page 20 of 21 <br />PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and VTM 8528 Planning Commission <br /> 990 Sycamore Road <br /> Page 19 of 21 <br />type and locations of HM controls to be installed, <br /> sizing calculations using Bay Area Hydrology Model (BAHM). The Stormwater Management Plan <br /> shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Director of Engineering/City Engineer, prior to <br /> issuance of an engineering or building permit, whichever occurs first. Stormwater HM controls <br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and VTM 8528 Planning Commission <br /> 990 Sycamore Road <br /> Page 14 of 21 <br />