Laserfiche WebLink
Street-View Visual Simulation for Lot 1 <br /> 3 <br /> a-, <br /> , ' , <br /> v l ,t„*F ^Y R lr* M1 4r <br /> w. a J.. .,,...r ".3`Y§ ,� .,/W s 4 r Y4 a`�.a i.- <br /> w. r „ _ <br /> ..., + _ <br /> 41 dAki' <br /> A .a <br /> 1.. , , <br /> s <br /> - —....i: 1 <br /> �- 11/MMIMMOOOMMIIII. maININNIMENIIIIIrrP 4,*: <br /> Figure 2: View from Sycamore Road, directly in front of Lot 1 <br /> _ _ , .. iii,:,,,,,,:y„... 4f , , 407( ,„ <br /> i <br /> yet <br /> Xl ♦ . <br /> .a • <br /> i� i4 dt "t <br /> -•�=_'_'.,.,:.r_,, r'• <br /> mom <br /> .-.•maA q, 111. IIPI�♦- s i.'M � <br /> ' <br /> �5 l <br /> . � ,; <br /> oma- <br /> X . rr � <br /> 41.. 4\,\\\ <br /> Figure 3: View from Sycamore Road, near Dale Way <br />Figure 1 : View from Alisal Street near Minnie Drive, Looking North <br /> FAR, Proposed or <br /> Actual (w/o 600sf <br /> garage) 15% 15% 17% 18% 15% 16% 18% 18% 15% 17% <br /> Max sf w/o gar 5,181 8,625 8,015 8,102 8,102 8,102 8,276 8,102 8,189 8189 <br /> FAR, Maximum* 15% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% <br /> Actual Front Setback <br /> in ft na 30 _ 36 39 49 44 50 48 50 43 <br /> Min Front Setback in <br /> ft 70' 25' _ 25' 25' _ 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' <br /> Side Setback in ft <br /> (one side/combined <br /> side) 60'/95' 5'/50' 5'/50' 5'/50' 5'/50' 5'/50' 5'/50' 5'/50' 5'/50' <br /> *Per PC Staff Report dated 7/18/2018, Table 4, p 12 <br /> Note: The square footage for each lot includes only enclosed structures and were pulled from City permit records. <br /> Note: The dwelling at 950 Syc Rd is 4,481 sf+ 214 sf addition. Total: 4695 sf. <br />t actually is. The combined acreage for Lot 1 and Lot 5 is 2.27 acres, <br /> well above the two acre minimum for two agricultural lots. <br /> We have researched all related permits to provide the Planning Commission with an "apples to <br /> apples" comparison with the neighboring Bridle Creek homes. Please see the chart on the <br /> following page for details. <br /> Existing chain link fence I <br /> l <br /> \. �R\ora % within creek setback to s HTli', --`�"r <br /> O Existin Fence to remain 1,�,„�Nlc �-- <br /> / <br /> \ - k0---'-1 -----'—\”- <br /> _ —\ mxw- g remain'�\ ,4) \ -., ' <br /> T <br /> - —sy <br /> o - <br /> I I—I I I Feet <br />asible, the applicant shall submit a report from a certified <br /> arborist acceptable to the City indicating trenching will not be detrimental to the health of <br /> the tree. <br /> c. Nothing may be stored within the dripline of the tree canopies. This includes equipment, <br /> oil, gas, chemicals, harmful materials, fill or storage. <br /> d. No oil, gasoline, chemicals, or other harmful materials shall be deposited or disposed <br /> within the dripline of the trees or in drainage channels, swales, or areas that may lead to <br /> the dripline. <br /> e. No sign, wires, or ropes shall be attached to the trees. <br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and VTM 8528 Planning Commission <br /> 990 Sycamore Road <br /> Page 20 of 21 <br />PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and VTM 8528 Planning Commission <br /> 990 Sycamore Road <br /> Page 19 of 21 <br />type and locations of HM controls to be installed, <br /> sizing calculations using Bay Area Hydrology Model (BAHM). The Stormwater Management Plan <br /> shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Director of Engineering/City Engineer, prior to <br /> issuance of an engineering or building permit, whichever occurs first. Stormwater HM controls <br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and VTM 8528 Planning Commission <br /> 990 Sycamore Road <br /> Page 14 of 21 <br />