My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
5_Exhibits A-G
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
05-27
>
5_Exhibits A-G
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2020 3:27:16 PM
Creation date
5/20/2020 3:26:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/27/2020
Document Relationships
5
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\05-27
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
b. Balances the potentially competing interests of current residents of the planning area, potential <br /> future residents of the planning area, and current and future residents of the surrounding <br /> residential developments; and <br /> c. Provide individual property owners with a framework within which they can development <br /> independently, but in an orderly manner which is harmonious with a comprehensive land use plan <br /> for the study area. <br /> Therefore, in order to facilitate orderly developments within the NSSP, developments need to <br /> be proposed in a manner consistent with the NSSP based on its land use plan, allowable <br /> density, and number of residential lots, rather than amending the NSSP to accommodate a <br /> proposed development inconsistent with the plan. For this reason, staff does not support <br /> changing the NSSP land use for the proposed development. <br /> Despite this recommendation, staff acknowledges the Planning Commission's prior work <br /> session discussion, which indicated support for allowing three lots along Sycamore Creek <br /> Road, in addition to (at least) the existing single-family home. The rationale to support that <br /> concept include that: <br /> 1 . The topography of the site creates a natural separation between the northern portion of <br /> the site from the southern portion; <br /> 2. The 3-lot design fronting Sycamore Creek Way follows the design and lotting pattern of <br /> the existing neighborhood; <br /> 3. Utilities to accommodate new homes are readily available; and <br /> 4. The increase in units, if approved, would remain within the total buildout capacity of the <br /> North Sycamore Specific Plan. <br /> Rezoning <br /> The applicant is proposing to rezone the northern approximately 1.01-acre portion of the site to <br /> Planned Unit Development — Medium Density Residential (PUD-MDR) District and the <br /> southern approximately 2.27-acre portion of the site would retain the PUD-A zoning. The gross <br /> density for MDR is 3.5 units per acre. The proposed PUD-MDR portion of the site would <br /> generate a density of 3 units per acre, less than 3.5 units per acre; thus meeting the PUD- <br /> MDR zoning category of the NSSP. <br /> As the purpose of the zoning category change is to accommodate the proposed development, <br /> staff would not support this proposed amendment in order to gain additional residential lots, for <br /> similar reasons as cited above. <br /> Access onto Sycamore Creek Way <br /> The NSSP allotted a total of three residential lots on the project site but did not specify or allow <br /> access for new lots created to gain access from Sycamore Road. However, recognizing that <br /> Sycamore Creek Way has now been constructed, and provides easy and logical access to this <br /> side of the property, staff could support the amendment to allow for such access. <br /> Trail Realignment <br /> As shown in Figure 7 on page 12 of this report, the proposed realignment would continue to <br /> provide a logical connection between the existing trail terminus and Sycamore Road, could <br /> have fewer environmental impacts to the creek, and would reduce potential conflicts between <br /> trail users and private property owners. As mentioned earlier in the report, the proposed <br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and Vesting Tentative Map 8528 <br /> 990 Sycamore Road Planning Commission <br /> 14 of 23 <br /> 13 of 23 <br /><br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and Vesting Tentative Map 8528 <br /> 990 Sycamore Road Planning Commission <br /> 9 of 23 <br />ipline of the trees or in drainage channels, swales, or areas that may lead to <br /> the dripline. <br /> e. No sign, wires, or ropes shall be attached to the trees. <br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and VTM 8528 Planning Commission <br /> 990 Sycamore Road <br /> Page 20 of 21 <br />PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and VTM 8528 Planning Commission <br /> 990 Sycamore Road <br /> Page 19 of 21 <br />type and locations of HM controls to be installed, <br /> sizing calculations using Bay Area Hydrology Model (BAHM). The Stormwater Management Plan <br /> shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Director of Engineering/City Engineer, prior to <br /> issuance of an engineering or building permit, whichever occurs first. Stormwater HM controls <br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and VTM 8528 Planning Commission <br /> 990 Sycamore Road <br /> Page 14 of 21 <br />