My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
5_Exhibits A-G
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
05-27
>
5_Exhibits A-G
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2020 3:27:16 PM
Creation date
5/20/2020 3:26:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/27/2020
Document Relationships
5
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\05-27
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT F <br /> Stefanie Ananthan <br /> From: S McGinnis <br /> Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 5:52 PM <br /> To:Jenny Soo <JSoo@cityofpleasantonca.gov> <br /> Subject: PUD-135, P19-0031 Alaina Stewart/Bringhurst LLC <br /> I am Steven McGinnis, a resident of Sycamore Creek Way in Pleasanton, California. Our residence is within 500' of <br /> the subject property's proposed development. <br /> I would like the Planning Commission to know that the owners of the property have been excellent neighbors. Although <br /> we don't know each other, I do know that they have kept the property free of weeds,vermin and debris for the more <br /> than fifteen years we have lived in our home. They have proven to be responsible property owners through the period. <br /> That said,we urge the Commission to approve the amendment to the North Sycamore Specific Plan. Completing the <br /> development of the vacant property on our street would benefit the property's neighbors,the neighborhood and the <br /> City of Pleasanton. Completion of the three homes along Sycamore Creek Way will add to the attraction of our <br /> neighborhood and it would also add value to the city's property tax base. <br /> Because of the current medical emergency, I will not be attending the hearing, but I am available to provide any <br /> additional information the Commission may request. <br /> Steven McGinnis <br /> Click <br /> https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/MTjHYfg0oRvGX2PQPOmvUj_GOBh06pKKsLbe9gpLUIVsIDLPg35_OMgYcAgplusgL7i- <br /> ddV_sQYNCU1_U1Tbvw== to report this email as spam. <br /> 1 <br />1. He requested information on character and what had been done to retain a similar <br /> feel on Dale Way. He stated he was amenable to 70-foot setbacks but would prefer increased <br /> setback from Dale Way. <br /> In response to Vice Chair Brown, Commissioner Pace stated his support for five lots was not <br /> conditioned around an amenity but would prefer the proposed amenity come back to the <br /> Commission. <br /> Ms. Clark explained it was a City Council decision, but the Commission could provide input. <br /> Commissioner Allen indicated support for five lots, with increased setback from Dale Way and <br /> setback from Sycamore Road to be greater than 70 feet, a smaller building pad and a visual <br /> representing the massing of the house and which gives an actual depiction of what can be <br /> Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, January 22, 2020 Page 6 of 7 <br /> help maintain trails. He expressed concern about the size and massing of the <br /> proposed structure. <br /> Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, January 22, 2020 Page 5 of 7 <br />e single family home plus an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) was <br /> allowed; she explained the allowance for ADUs. <br /> Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, January 22, 2020 Page 4 of 7 <br />l development,' NSSP, page 75. She pointed out the <br /> proposed agricultural lots. She referenced the visuals of the lots and clarified that the family <br /> was asking for an update to the NSSP to allow for the proposed development. She continued <br /> by referencing Senate Bill 50, passed on January 6, 2020, regarding housing projects and the <br /> state providing housing to all income levels. She referenced a visual simulation to demonstrate <br /> the size of the lots and discussed support from the neighbors. <br /> Laverne Spotorno, resident of Pleasanton and family within the City for over 250 years, <br /> provided support for the project and encouraged the Commission to approve the plan, with <br /> whatever conditions may be set forth. <br /> Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, January 22, 2020 Page 1 of 7 <br />ed to review of its consistency with the approved PUD development plan <br /> and compliance with State-mandated findings. As noted earlier, staff does not support the <br /> proposed five-lot residential development, and thus does not support the Vesting Tentative <br /> Map as proposed. However, should the Planning Commission support a version of the PUD <br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and Vesting Tentative Map 8528 <br /> 990 Sycamore Road Planning Commission <br /> 21 of 23 <br /> review and acceptance by the Director of Engineering/City Engineer, prior to <br /> issuance of an engineering or building permit, whichever occurs first. Stormwater HM controls <br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and VTM 8528 Planning Commission <br /> 990 Sycamore Road <br /> Page 14 of 21 <br />