Laserfiche WebLink
condemnation of the public street left a remainder of vacant <br />land on the entire property more or less to the south and <br />southeast of the existing motel building on the southerly <br />portion of the entire property ("P.U.D. Area"). Pursuant to <br />Section 2.F of the Settlement Agreement, the City agreed to <br />immediately consider adoption of an ordinance approving a <br />Development Agreement for the P.U.D. Area. The Settlement <br />Agreement conceptually approved the right to subdivide and <br />use the P.U.D. Area. The P.U.D. Area is shown by such <br />designation on Exhibit 2 attached hereto and incorporated <br />herein by reference. (Exhibit 2 is the same as Exhibit "C" <br />to the Settlement Agreement). <br /> <br /> D. All procedures relating to this Development Agreement <br />have been followed in accordance with the law. <br /> <br /> E. This Development Agreement establishes logical and <br />appropriate rights of use and use limitations upon the <br />P.U.D. Area. It is to the advantage of both parties and <br />consistent with good planning practice to prevent future <br />disputes which could result from the creation of an unusual <br />remnant of vacant land caused by the City's eminent domain <br /> <br />action. <br /> <br /> F. On April 10, <br />Pleasanton found that <br />with the General Plan, <br /> <br />1984, the City Council of the City of <br />the Development Agreement is consistent <br /> <br /> any applicable specific plans, and <br /> <br />the zoning, subdivision and other applicable regulatory <br />ordinances of the City of Pteasanton. <br /> <br /> G. On April 24, 1984, the <br />Pleasanton, adopted Ordinance No. <br /> <br />City Council of the City of <br />1135 _ approving this <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br /> <br />