|
Resolution No. PC-2021-12
<br /> Page Two
<br /> addition, the technical studies identified no new information or changed circumstances
<br /> that would require supplemental environmental review, and is consistent with the
<br /> previously approved EIR that it is adequate to serve as the environmental
<br /> documentation for this Project and satisfy all the requirements for CEQA.
<br /> Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission finds pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
<br /> Section 15183, Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning,
<br /> additional environmental review is not required because there are no project-specific
<br /> significant effects peculiar to the project or its site that would result from the proposed
<br /> project. Accordingly, no changes to mitigation measures, findings, or statement of
<br /> overriding considerations are needed.
<br /> Section 2: Findings for Conditional Use Permit Approval
<br /> With respect to the approval of the Conditional Use Permit (Case P20-0994), the
<br /> Planning Commission makes the following findings as required by Section 18.124.070
<br /> of the Pleasanton Municipal Code:
<br /> A. That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accordance with the
<br /> objectives of the zoning ordinance and the purpose of the district in which
<br /> the site is located.
<br /> Some of the objectives of the zoning ordinance are to: foster a harmonious,
<br /> convenient, workable relationship among land uses, protect existing land uses
<br /> from inharmonious influences and harmful intrusions, and ensure that public and
<br /> private lands ultimately are used for the purposes which are most appropriate
<br /> and beneficial to the City as a whole. The subject property is located with the
<br /> Rural Density Residential area which has the rural characteristics and follows the
<br /> City's Residential District uses. One purpose of the Residential District is to
<br /> provide space for semipublic facilities, such as religious facilities and churches,
<br /> needed to complement urban residential areas and for institutions that require a
<br /> residential environment. As conditioned, staff believes the proposed use is
<br /> consistent with the zoning ordinance objectives and Residential District purpose
<br /> because it would provide religious services to the community and would be
<br /> conducted so as to not impact or interfere with the surrounding residential uses.
<br /> The proposed use would be conducted indoors and is proposed to provide
<br /> adequate circulation and parking to support the use. The applicant would also be
<br /> required to mitigate any future nuisances that may occur as a result of the
<br /> proposed use.
<br /> B. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under
<br /> which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the
<br /> public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or
<br /> improvements in the vicinity.
<br /> Religious facilities are a common use within or near residential areas in
<br /> Pleasanton. The City's past experience shows these uses rarely result in land
<br /> use incompatibilities and are therefore not detrimental to public health, safety, or
<br /> welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity.
<br />UD-114-01M& P20-0995 Planning Commission
<br /> Page 18 of 25
<br />agement
<br /> Plan as part of the improvement plans prepared by a California licensed civil engineer,
<br /> which include but is not limited to the type, location, and sizing calculations of the
<br /> PUD-114-01M& P20-0995 Planning Commission
<br /> Page 16 of 25
<br /> PUD-114-01M& P20-0995 Planning Commission
<br /> Page 3 of 25
<br />YCROSSCRISFIELD .*- 4-; -,47÷-'' 1.1--1 ''.-. HAM
<br /> ;-----fk;s7,4G
<br /> il
<br /> 3`
<br /> • kst • .7
<br /> I DIJNIYA1:1%, ..4.. ,i4is' '1 , „J 10 ,,,...
<br /> ‘1 'kTIAV - 1) \ ‘ ' ?) $.Y \t, ,2:2/
<br /> \ ‘ 111-,-,: .
<br /> ,..... i ..., i
<br /> 1:11,343
<br /> o 0.125 0.25 mi PUD-140, Townsend, Lot Line, 2207 Martin Ave Planning Division =-- -.• .-.... , 1:16
<br /> I i II May 10,2021 FLEA:.,ANTON.
<br /> 0 650 1,300 Feet
<br />
|