Laserfiche WebLink
CONSENT CALENDAR <br />None. <br />MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC <br />2. Introductions / Awards / Recognitions <br />None. <br />3. Public Comment from the audience regarding items not listed on the agenda <br />Monith Ilavarasan indicated he was a representative for the Genesis, a nonprofit organization, which is <br />endorsing the California Statewide Communities Development Authority Workforce Housing Program. <br />He commented on converting 354 market rate units at Stoneridge apartments to lower middle- and <br />moderate -income housing that would improve things for those who live in the apartments and many of <br />them being essential workers in the City of Pleasanton. Mr. Ilavarasan noted that monthly savings could <br />be between $300-400 for an individual or family and allow people to be able to save and plan for the <br />future. He asked that the commission review this project at the next available opportunity so a <br />recommendation can be made on whether the city should move forward on the project. <br />Chairperson Galvin thanked Mr. Ilavarasan for his comments and advised that the commission was <br />unable to make comment because this was not an item for discussion on the agenda. Mr. Ilavarasan <br />indicated he would send information on this to Mr. Hernandez so it could be shared with the <br />commission. <br />Commissioner Kiziloglu asked that the commission be allowed to question Mr. Ilavarasan about the <br />project so they would be better informed before receiving the information he sends to staff. <br />Mr. Ilavarasan indicated that this project would be an opportunity for the city to partner with a few <br />nonprofits and government organizations to purchase, or jointly purchase, the Stoneridge apartment <br />complex and convert some of the units to low-, moderate-, and middle-income housing. He noted that <br />other details with the project would include the city giving up property tax on the property and in about <br />30 years be able to decide whether they wish to further increase the affordability or flip the property. <br />Commissioner Kiziloglu questioned if this was something that the city could potentially use towards the <br />affordable housing issue on which it is currently working. Mr. Ilavarasan stated that his understanding is <br />that this would not count towards current RHNA numbers; however, a bill going through state <br />legislature will allow for these projects to count towards numbers in the future. <br />Chairperson Galvin asked that the conversation on this matter discontinue since it was not an item on <br />the meeting agenda. <br />Mr. Dolan noted that this is a matter has been brought to the attention of staff for the past several <br />months and is something City Council has asked to be included in the Housing Element policy <br />discussion and once details have been prepared it will be scheduled for the commission to review. <br />4. Review and provide comments on draft Preliminary Report sections for the 6t" Cycle <br />(2023-2031) Housing Element Update <br />Chairperson Soby opened the meeting for public comment on this item. <br />Jocelyn Combs — Ms. Combs referenced a letter she had sent to the Housing Commission dated <br />September 14, 2021 in which she outlined her comments on the Housing Needs Assessment. She <br />Housing Commission <br />September 16, 2021 <br />Page 2 of 9 <br />