My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
101921
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2021 2:18:54 PM
Creation date
10/13/2021 2:14:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/19/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
spring will take about 18 -months and the plan is for it to end in January 2023 with an adopted Housing <br />Element. She noted the commission will continue to be involved throughout the process, and public <br />engagement will continue via meetings and other events. Ms. Murillo reviewed with report sections with <br />commissioners that included basic housing needs and special housing needs. She noted that <br />Pleasanton has a higher income population compared to other areas, has 20% of households that are <br />low-income (earning under $110,000 for a 4 -person household), has a high rate (70%) of <br />homeownership, and has more jobs than residents. <br />Additionally, commissioners were advised that only 8% of people who work in Pleasanton live in the city <br />which shows a disconnect between jobs and residents; seniors make up 15% of the population; 7% are <br />people with disabilities who may require accessibility improvements to their homes and living <br />conditions; approximately 120 Pleasanton people are experiencing homelessness; and about 3,520 <br />people are living in poverty. <br />Ms. Murillo advised that in reviewing Pleasanton housing, it was noted that most is single-family <br />housing with three or more bedrooms, and about 50% of the households are occupied by one or two <br />people. She commented on the cost of housing and noted that 25% of homeowners and 44% of renters <br />in Pleasanton are cost burdened which means they are spending over 30% of their income on housing. <br />Commissioners were provided further information by Ms. Murillo on governmental constraints that <br />create uncertainty in areas of permitting and approval process and State law that must be considered <br />and addressed. She discussed new bills that have passed since the City of Pleasanton adopted their <br />current Housing Element that now need to be included and commented on programs that currently exist <br />and may need to be modified or updated. <br />Ms. Murillo talked about housing programs offered by the city and resources available at the regional, <br />state, and federal level. She noted that it may be necessary for the city to address, improve or enhance <br />its existing programs. <br />Ms. Hagen advised that as the city moves forward through the Housing Element process staff will be <br />providing summaries of the outreach that is being conducted and that at this meeting information has <br />been provided from the recent community/stakeholder meetings and survey at which people were <br />introduced to the Housing Element Update. She noted that the stakeholder meetings were intended to <br />provide insight to high priority considerations for the Housing Element Update and allowing <br />stakeholders to better understand the challenges and opportunities. <br />Commissioners were informed by Ms. Hagen that stakeholder meetings were held via Zoom by Lisa <br />Wise Consulting representatives and staff members. She noted that the housing developer group <br />commented on the complicated process of building in Pleasanton due to the city review process and <br />fee constraints combined with recent labor challenges and cost of materials, while service providers <br />focused on specific housing needs of varying populations. <br />Ms. Hagen noted that the consensus from these meetings was that local businesses have a <br />challenging time recruiting employees and young professionals due to the lack of housing affordability <br />for entry level workers in Pleasanton. She advised that people recognized housing needs with the <br />potential for redeveloping existing or older commercial centers with a consistent theme of the survey <br />being maintaining the value and importance of an existing neighborhood's character. <br />Commissioners were advised by Ms. Hagen that staff was requesting them to provide additional items <br />for discussion that they do not believe are already included in the list of policy items and noted that <br />some programs and policies will be brought back to the commission for further in-depth discussion in <br />early spring 2022. She informed the commission that the next steps of the Housing Element Update will <br />be to review results of the community wide survey with the Housing and Planning Commissions and <br />City Council and in November and December hold a public workshop or community meeting, and once <br />Housing Commission <br />September 16, 2021 <br />Page 4 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.