My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
101921
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2021 2:18:54 PM
Creation date
10/13/2021 2:14:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/19/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Clark stated she was unable to provide information about sites that are in flood zones, subject to <br />contamination, or in earthquake fault zones but often constraints can be overcome within engineering <br />and design and noted that fewer of these types of risks exist in Pleasanton. She commented on <br />Pleasanton infrastructure that may be older and may present a constraint to development. <br />Commissioner Kiziloglu asked about water and sewer infrastructure build -out requirements for building <br />dense housing. Ms. Clark stated that was a technical question to which she did not have answers since <br />there were variants for building a single-family home or multi -family units. <br />Ms. Hagen asked if the commission needed any clarification on housing resources in Appendix G of the <br />preliminary report. She noted that housing resources are all different programs that the city offers <br />including the loan programs and different resources available to residents. <br />Commissioner Duggan indicated that in reviewing the list of resources she did not see East Bay <br />Community Energy on the list as a resource and felt it should be included. <br />Commissioner Kiziloglu commented on Section 8 housing being closed for the last five years and not <br />now being an available resource. She also felt other resources on the list may not be available. Ms. <br />Clark thanked her for the information. Commissioner Kiziloglu asked about low-income credits available <br />to developers but not members of the community. Ms. Clark advised that the resource list includes <br />resources directly available to residents as well as developers. <br />Commissioner Soby questioned whether staff could foresee new federal, state, or local programs on <br />resources becoming available. Ms. Clark noted the state had identified a large portionof funds available <br />to support affordable housing and recent federal plans may provide additional funding opportunities. <br />In the last section reviewed by Ms. Hagen, she noted it was a review of existing programs, how they <br />have fared over the past 6-7 years, together with recommendations on if they should continue, be <br />modified, or removed. She asked commissioners to comment on items they think should be included. <br />Commissioner Kiziloglu asked staff to define the housing division between the Housing and Planning <br />commissions. Ms. Clark advised that the Housing Division is the department of the city that facilitates <br />programs and resources, and the Housing Commission is the advisory body on housing matters. She <br />commented on the policy ideas that have been identified and indicated that staff was not expecting to <br />get into heavy discussion on these at this meeting but would like commissioners to identify things they <br />do not see on the list they think are important for the Housing Element process. <br />Ms. Clark commented on the existing Housing Element program, accomplishments and achievements, <br />feedback received, and goals for this next Housing Element. She noted this was an opportunity for the <br />city to broaden horizons and the commission to indicate what else could or should be considered for <br />programs, actions, or items that might be addressed. <br />Commissioner Fischer thought the Housing Element was being conducted because it was something <br />the state had mandated but based on what Ms. Clark was saying it appears things can be added to it. <br />Ms. Clark advised that the city has a robust program of actions needed to address the community <br />housing needs and reduce any barriers in place to produce affordable housing and preserve the <br />existing housing supply. She noted that the state outlines parameters within which the city must define <br />a range of programs and specific approach to address the local housing needs. <br />In reference to the issue of homelessness, Commissioner Fischer questioned if discussions should be <br />about creating housing for various income levels and asked staff to clarify this for her. Ms. Clark <br />indicated that it covered all levels from someone homeless who does not have a roof over their head to <br />someone else who may be struggling paying their rent, or who cannot find a unit to meet their family's <br />needs. She discussed issues around housing and the need to address specific challenges noting that <br />the Housing Element is an opportunity for communities to be more ambitious in identify needs and <br />Housing Commission <br />September 16, 2021 <br />Page 8 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.