Laserfiche WebLink
whereas the City of Livermore had a better balance, with about 20 percent of employees <br />working locally. She stated staff could also bring back additional data. <br />Commissioner Morgan referenced the written correspondence received and inquired about <br />additional sources of funding for lower income housing projects. Ms. Clark stated staff was <br />always searching for funds and welcomed suggestions. She mentioned both the Federal and <br />State governments had recently allocated more funding towards housing to help subsidize <br />affordable housing, which was a positive. <br />Commissioner Gaidos thanked staff and the consultant for the work completed thus far. He <br />mentioned the diversity of the cities within the Tri -Valley and those across Alameda County. <br />He asked and confirmed that eight percent of jobs in Pleasanton were occupied or employed <br />by Pleasanton residents, but 15.2 percent of working Pleasanton residents worked in <br />Pleasanton in 2018. He discussed Dublin residents that worked in Dublin. He encouraged <br />development of housing for the forgotten class. <br />Chair Brown mentioned his desire to hear more about the survey and inquired of any mention <br />or recognition of East Pleasanton as a site. Ms. Hagen stated in a question on where new <br />housing opportunities should be located, 65 respondents (out of 486) mentioned housing in <br />East Pleasanton. Chair Brown mentioned the allowance for non -Pleasanton residents to <br />attend Pleasanton schools. Ms. Clark responded that when staff had the ability to orient <br />housing towards those in need, it could sometimes do so based on residency and employment <br />criteria. <br />Chair Brown inquired about school constraints and if that would fall within the housing <br />constraints analysis. Ms. Clark discussed staff's efforts to work with the School District on <br />housing sites and future housing demand based on school development. Chair Brown <br />discussed consideration of housing at Stoneridge Mall and school needs. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br />Jocelyn Combs provided public comment regarding the jobs/housing balance issue and the <br />need to provide housing to those employed within the City which would help the City attain its <br />Climate Action Plan (CAP) goals. She provided suggested modifications for accessory dwelling <br />units to provide affordable housing. <br />Becky Dennis provided public comment regarding partnering with corporations to integrate the <br />Climate Action Plan with the Housing Element. <br />Chair Brown acknowledged the public comments received, including the written public <br />comments from Ms. Dennis. He inquired whether staff had any remarks related to the public <br />comments. Ms. Clark responded that staff would provide the memo, provided to the <br />Commission, to Ms. Dennis to help clarify the differences of the data regarding the proportion <br />of employed residents who work in Pleasanton versus the number of jobs held by Pleasanton <br />residents. Chair Brown inquired whether staff had had an opportunity to look through the <br />written public comments received by Ms. Dennis, which annotated various sections of the draft <br />Preliminary Report and included recommendations. Ms. Clark stated staff would review the <br />written comments and make any adjustments to clarify or correct inaccuracies, or elaborate on <br />Excerpt: Draft Planning Commission Minutes, September 22, 2021 Page 2 of 6 <br />