My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
101921
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2021 2:18:54 PM
Creation date
10/13/2021 2:14:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/19/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLEASANTON <br />ITEM 4: PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />��?+�, HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE eE <br />2. 18.5 Should the Affordable Housing fee be used to work with non-profit <br />developer be a high priority? Yes, great idea! Say the fee "will" be used for <br />that purpose. See #1 above and #2 under Housing Constraints. Yes, <br />Sunflower Hill was a success and was driven by a proactive organization. <br />For affordable housing in Pleasanton, Pleasanton needs to be just as <br />proactive. <br />3. Add a program of Preservation Options to specifically address Page A59 <br />"Assisted units at risk of conversion". The existing programs are vague. <br />There are 672 low-income units in Pleasanton at risk of conversion to <br />market rate in more than 10 years. It isn't clear where these are. They must <br />have been built before 2001 because after that date all affordable units are in <br />perpetuity, right? 672 units is a large number for us. There should be a <br />section for "Preservation Options" similar to other cities. Ten years is not <br />too soon to work on keeping them affordable. <br />4. 36.1 "Workforce Housing" has come to be used as the name for the <br />"forgotten or missing middle" or low and moderate housing, which <br />eliminates very low housing. Consider using "essential or service worker <br />housing" which would include very low. <br />5. Program 38.3 sort of addresses office conversions but is not so much <br />conversions but tear downs. Expand 38.3 to look at true conversions. Office <br />conversions deserves its own discussion. Although I haven't seen another <br />city address this, my guess is that with more employees working from home, <br />some businesses may choose to close their offices. This could present an <br />opportunity to convert office space to affordable housing. With a policy in <br />the Housing Element allowing this conversion, perhaps encouraging it, <br />Pleasanton would be prepared. <br />6. 40.3 "If the City acquires or obtains control of a potential housing site... " <br />Change the first word to "When". <br />7. 46.1 Environmental Protection. Thank you! <br />8. 46.2 Thank you for eliminating use of the Low -Income Housing Fund for <br />this purpose. <br />9. Add a program to work with faith -based institution properties to build <br />affordable housing. According to the stakeholder group, some are interested. <br />Item 4 - Provided to Housing Commission for the September 16, 2021 Meeting <br />AFTER PACKET DISTRIBUTION 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.