Laserfiche WebLink
Environmental Checklist <br />Tribal Cultural Resources <br /> <br />Draft Initial Study – Negative Declaration 83 <br />19 Utilities and Service Systems <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Less than <br />Significant <br />with <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact <br />Would the project: <br />a. Require or result in the relocation or <br />construction of new or expanded water, <br />wastewater treatment or storm water <br />drainage, electric power, natural gas, or <br />telecommunications facilities, the <br />construction or relocation of which could <br />cause significant environmental effects? □ □ ■ □ <br />b. Have sufficient water supplies available to <br />serve the project and reasonably <br />foreseeable future development during <br />normal, dry and multiple dry years? □ □ □ ■ <br />c. Result in a determination by the <br />wastewater treatment provider which <br />serves or may serve the project that it has <br />adequate capacity to serve the project’s <br />projected demand in addition to the <br />provider’s existing commitments? □ □ □ ■ <br />d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or <br />local standards, or in excess of the capacity <br />of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair <br />the attainment of solid waste reduction <br />goals? □ □ □ ■ <br />e. Comply with federal, State, and local <br />management and reduction statutes and <br />regulations related to solid waste? □ □ □ ■ <br />a. Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, <br />wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or <br />telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant <br />environmental effects? <br />The CAP 2.0 is a policy document aimed at reducing solid waste production and energy and water <br />consumption, amongst other issues, and the related GHG emissions throughout Pleasanton and <br />does not include site-specific infrastructure designs or project proposals. Implementing the CAP 2.0 <br />would not result in an increase in population and housing nor would it facilitate growth beyond that <br />anticipated by the Pleasanton General Plan. As such, implementing the CAP 2.0 would not create <br />new demand related to water, wastewater, stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas power,