My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 11:41:35 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 11:33:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
14
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 1-5
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix F - I
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton–Spotorno Ranch Reduced Development Project <br />Environmental Checklist Initial Study/Consistency Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />122 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480021/Consistency Checklist/21480021 Spotorno Ranch Consistency Checklist ScreenCheck.docx <br />The 1998 HVSP FEIR determined that the proposed project is not susceptible to regional flooding <br />hazards, is not located within mapped dam failure inundation areas, and that the elevation of the <br />project site (ranging from 340 to 863 feet AMSL as described in the 1998 HVSP; the current <br />elevations from the development plan for the proposed project range from 380 to 736 feet) and <br />distance from the coast preclude potential inundation by coastal hazards, such as tsunamis, extreme <br />high tides, or sea level rise. Therefore, the 1998 HVSP FEIR determined that this impact was less than <br />significant. <br />Construction of the residential portion of the proposed project would include grading and <br />excavation, construction of structures and roadways, and an increase in impervious surfaces. As part <br />of the project design, two DMAs would be constructed to control and direct stormwater flow toward <br />bioretention and self-retaining areas. There are existing water pipelines located along Alisal Street <br />and Westbridge Lane, to which the proposed project would connect. The proposed project would <br />adhere to the General Construction Permit and Alameda County Clean Water Program guidelines to <br />prevent erosion, flooding, and surface runoff. With adherence to these guidelines and regulations, <br />the project would not result in an increased risk of pollutants due to project inundation. <br />A majority of the City of Pleasanton falls within the 5- to 40-minute inundation area in the event of a <br />Del Valle Dam failure. The project site is located roughly 7 miles west of the Del Valle Dam, and is not <br />within the Del Valle Dam inundation area. The elevation of the project site (ranging from 340 to 863 <br />feet AMSL) and distance from the coast preclude potential inundation by coastal hazards, such as <br />tsunami or seiche. <br />The project site is not located within the 100-year flood hazard area or the 500-year flood hazard <br />area. The project site is located in Flood Hazard Zone X, an area of minimal flood hazards.30 The <br />nearest Special Flood Hazard Area is located to the west of Pleasanton Sunol Road, 1 mile west of <br />the project site. Therefore, residential units would not be affected by flood zones. Additionally, the <br />project site is not in the Del Valle Dam inundation area.31 The nearest tsunami inundation zone as <br />mapped by the California Emergency Management Agency is 11.5 miles west of the project site.32 <br />Therefore, the proposed project is not at risk of inundation from a tsunami or seiche. The proposed <br />project is not likely to result in impacts because there is a low risk of flooding, tsunami, and seiche at <br />the project site. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any peculiar effects and would <br />not result in new or more severe impacts related to project inundation beyond what was previously <br />analyzed in the 1998 HVSP FEIR. <br />e) Water Quality Control or Sustainable Groundwater Management Plans Consistency <br /> <br />30 City of Pleasanton. 2009. Pleasanton General Plan 2005-2025, Chapter 5, Public Safety Element, Figure 5-7, Flood Hazard Zones. <br />Website: https://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=23899. Accessed February 26, 2021. <br />31 City of Pleasanton. 2009. Pleasanton General Plan 2005-2025, Chapter 5, Public Safety Element, Figure 5-8, Del Valle Dam <br />Inundation Area. Website: https://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=23899. Accessed February <br />26, 2021. <br />32 California Emergency Management Agency. 2009. Tsunami Inundation map for Emergency Planning – Newark Quadrangle, Redwood <br />Point Quadrangle. July 31. Website: https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/Documents/Publications/Tsunami- <br />Maps/Tsunami_Inundation_NewarkRedwoodPoint_Quads_Alameda.pdf. Accessed February 26, 2021.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.