My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 11:41:35 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 11:33:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
14
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 1-5
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix F - I
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Summary of 2018 Spotorno Ranch Air Quality Analysis <br />March 22, 2021 <br />Page 15 <br /> <br />As shown in Table 8 the project’s long-term operational emissions would not exceed the BAAQMD’s <br />threshold of significance. Therefore, the project’s GHG emissions would be less than significant. <br />Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan Consistency <br />Significance for this impact is determined by project compliance with the City of Pleasanton Climate <br />Action Plan (CAP),3 which is a qualified GHG Reduction Plan according to the BAAQMD’s 2017 <br />guidelines.4 The City’s CAP identifies policies that will achieve the State-recommended GHG reduction <br />target of 15 percent below 2008 levels by the year 2020 and the locally adopted reduction goal of 15 <br />percent below 2005 levels by 2020. The CAP provides goals, supporting strategies, and associated <br />actions in the topical areas of energy, land use and transportation, solid waste minimization, water and <br />wastewater, and community engagement. To assess compliance with the City ’s CAP, a consistency <br />analysis was performed for applicable requirements and is discussed below. <br />In summary, the project would not conflict with the City of Pleasanton CAP or regulations adopted by the <br />State of California to reduce GHG emission and would comply with all mandatory local and regional <br />measures applicable to the project. As shown in Impact GHG-1, the project would incrementally increase <br />GHG emissions, but not to a level that would generate significant effects. Considering this information, the <br />project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted to reduce the <br />emissions of GHGs. Impacts would be less than significant. <br /> <br /> <br />3 City of Pleasanton. 2012. City of Pleasanton Climate Action Plan. Website: http://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/civicax/filebank/ <br />blobdload.aspx?BlobID=24757. Accessed March 30, 2018. <br />4 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAQMD). 2017. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. May. Website: <br />http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017-pdf.pdf?la=en. Accessed March 29,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.