My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 11:41:35 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 11:33:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
14
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 1-5
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix F - I
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
18 <br />wildlife community but have also been shown to facilitate regional wildlife movement. Riparian <br />areas can vary from tributaries winding through scrubland to densely vegetated riparian forests. <br />A riparian zone can be defined as an area that has a source of fresh water (e.g., rill, stream, <br />river), a defined bank, and upland areas consisting of moist soils (e.g., wetter than would be <br />expected simply due to seasonal precipitation). These areas support a characteristic suite of <br />vegetative species, many of which are woody, that are adapted to moister soils. Such vegetation <br />in the project region may include California buckeye (Aesculus californica), dogwood (Cornus <br />sp.), California hazelnut (Corylus cornuta var. californica), elderberry (Sambucus sp.), Oregon <br />ash (Fraxinus latifolia), walnut (Juglans sp.), California laurel (Umbellularia californica), toyon <br />(Heteromeles arbutifolia), oaks (Quercus sp.), and willow (Salix sp.). <br />Beier and Loe (1992) noted five functions of corridors (rather than physical traits) that are <br />relevant when conducting an analysis regarding the value of linkages. The following five <br />functions should be used to evaluate the suitability of a given tract of land for use as a habitat <br />corridor: <br />1.) Wide ranging mammals can migrate and find mates; <br />2.) Plants can propagate within the corridor and beyond; <br />3.) Genetic integrity can be maintained; <br />4.) Animals can use the corridor in response to environmental changes or a catastrophic <br />event; <br />5.) Individuals can recolonize areas where local extinctions have occurred. <br />A corridor is “wide enough” when it meets these functions for the suite of animals in the area. It <br />is important to note that landscape linkages are used differently by different species. For <br />instance, medium to large mammals (or some bird species) may traverse a corridor in a matter of <br />minutes or hours, while smaller mammals or other species may take a longer period of time to <br />move through the same corridor (e.g., measured in days, weeks and even years). For example, <br />an individual cougar may traverse the entire length of a long narrow corridor in an hour while <br />travel of smaller species (such as rodent or rabbit species) may best be measured as gene flow <br />within regional populations. These examples demonstrate that landscape linkages are not simply <br />highways that animals use to move back and forth. While linkages may serve this purpose, they <br />also allow for slower or more infrequent movement. Width and length must be considered in
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.