Laserfiche WebLink
65 <br />It should be noted that the Congdon’s tarplant is a focal species under the EACCS and the <br />EACCS includes a standardized mitigation ration for this species of 5:1. General and species- <br />specific avoidance and minimization measures included in the EACCS Biological Opinion which <br />also will be implemented are included in Appendix B. <br />3.3.9 Potential Impacts to Riparian Habitat and Other Sensitive Natural Communities, <br />Including Federally Protected Wetlands <br />Potential Impact. Two wetland delineations have been conducted on the site, one by Olberding <br />in 2008 which was subsequently verified by USACE, and one by LOA in January and April <br />2015. The second delineation was conducted due to the expiration of the Jurisdictional <br />Determination (JD) for the prior delineation and because it appeared that the condition of <br />wetlands on the site had changed since the 2008 delineation. A site verification visit was <br />conducted with Keith Hess/USACE on June 30, 2016, however, although a new JD is <br />forthcoming, at the time of the preparation of this report, it had not yet been issued by USACE. <br />None the less, the final map submitted to USACE for verification arose from findings from the <br />verification site visit and therefore will be the map on which the JD is expected to be issued. <br />The LOA delineation determined that there are four seasonal wetlands and four drainage <br />channels on the site. Only Seasonal Wetland 4 in the western portion of the site near Alisal Street <br />(0.45 acres) and Drainage 1 (205 linear feet) in the northern portion of the site which is a <br />tributary to Sycamore Creek appear to be hydrologically connected other waters of the U.S. and <br />therefore would be considered jurisdictional by USACE. The other hydrologic features appear to <br />be isolated and therefore not considered jurisdictional by USACE, however, all the wetlands and <br />channels of the site, whether they are isolated or not, would be considered jurisdictional by the <br />RWQCB. For channels, the RWQCB’s jurisdiction has recently been expanded to include the <br />bed and bank of the channel. The on-site channels would also be considered jurisdictional by <br />CDFW to the top of the bank. <br /> The project will preserve most of the wetlands (totaling 1.28 acres) and all of the drainages <br />(totaling 896 linear feet) occurring on the site. Slope stabilization will result in permanent <br />impacts to Seasonal Wetland 2 (0.02 acres). This is a small wetland that is dominated by non- <br />native wetland species such as canary grass, and which provides no additional ecological