My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
041922
>
03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2022 11:54:17 AM
Creation date
4/13/2022 11:52:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/19/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cities of Dublin and Pleasanton | Disaster Debris Management Plan | 2022 <br />112 <br /> <br />a. Did the NFE solicit bids from an adequate numberxv of known suppliers, <br />providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the <br />bids? Yes No <br />b. If the NFE is a local or tribal government, was the invitation for bids <br />publicly advertised? Yes No N/A <br />c. Did the invitation for bids include any specifications and pertinent <br />attachments, and define the items or services in order for the bidder to <br />properly respond? Yes No <br />d. Did the NFE open all bids at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for <br />bids? Yes No <br />e. For local and tribal governments, were the bids opened publicly? <br /> Yes No N/A <br />f. Did the NFE award a firm fixed price contract award in writing to the lowest <br />responsive and responsible bidder? Yes No <br />g. If any bids were rejected, was there a sound documented reason supporting <br />the rejection? Yes No N/A <br />iv. Procurement by competitive proposals § 200.320(d) Yes No <br />1. Did the NFE publicize the Requests for Proposals (RFPs) and <br />identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance? Yes No <br />2. Did the NFE solicit proposals from an adequate number of qualified <br />sources?xvi Yes No <br />3. Did the NFE have a written method for conducting technical <br />evaluations of the proposals received and for selecting recipients? Yes <br />No <br />4. Did the NFE award the contract to the responsible firm whose <br />proposal is most advantageous to the program, with price and other factors <br />considered? Yes No <br />5. [Note regarding architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services: <br />The NFE may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based <br />procurement of A/E professional services whereby competitors' qualifications are <br />evaluated and the most qualified competitor is selected, subject to negotiation of <br />fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a <br />selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional <br />services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E <br />firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort.] <br />v. Noncompetitive proposals § 200.320(f) Yes No
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.