RES 221284 - Laserfiche WebLink

Cities of Dublin and Pleasanton | Disaster Debris Management Plan | 2022 144 SECTION 4. EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS 1. City will evaluate proposals using the following criteria: a. Proposal Requirements and Completeness of Proposal 5 points b. References, Experience, Reputation, and Compliance 30 points  Experience and reputation in managing debris removal and disposal projects within state and federal regulations and guidelines  Personnel experience and training  Financial stability c. Debris Management Services 25 points  Degree of City liability in proposed debris management methods  Breadth of service and number of contracts the Proposer can handle  Debris management methods and commitment to City debris management preferences  Availability of preferred disposal methods (for example, types of materials planned for reuse and recycling)  Ability to ensure debris is collected, sorted, transported safely, and reduced appropriately  Ability to serve a wide range of project types (for example, permanent facility, one- day event, and mobile collection unit) and community types (for example, rural, urban, and suburban) d. Responsiveness of Proposal 20 points  Demonstrated understanding of City and City needs  Demonstrated understanding of requirements of the RFP and contract  Quality of proposal and impressions of response as it relates to project  Additional services, ideas, or products that will benefit City e. Price 20 points  Reasonableness of Cost 2. An evaluation team will review all proposals received to determine the extent to which they comply with the requirements herein. The evaluation team may include representatives from local governments, City, or others with relevant expertise. 3. If a proposal fails to meet a material RFP requirement, the proposal may be rejected. A deviation is material to the extent that the proposal is not in substantial accord with the solicitation. Material deviations cannot be waived. Immaterial deviations may cause a bid to be rejected. 4. Proposals containing false or misleading statements may be rejected if the City regards the information as intentionally misleading regarding a requirement of the RFP. 5. During the evaluation process, City may require a Proposer representative to answer questions regarding the proposal. Proposer’s failure to demonstrate that the claims made in the proposal are true may be sufficient cause for deeming a proposal non-responsive.