Laserfiche WebLink
AUGUSTIN BERNAL MOUNTAIN BIKE TRAIL PROJECT DRAFT INITIAL STUDY <br /> from 1946 to 2016, and historic maps available from 1906 to 2018 were inspected to observe previous <br /> development in the project APE. The APE is currently undeveloped.These maps and images indicate that <br /> the APE has never had any development within it. <br /> On April 12, 2021, Dudek archaeologist William Burns conducted an intensive pedestrian survey of the <br /> APE.Survey was consistentwith Secretary of the Interior Standards.Mr.Burns inspected the ground surface <br /> for cultural resources, including artifacts, features, and/or midden soils. Surface visibility within the APE <br /> was low (<5% visibility) due to vegetation, with the exception of the existing informal bike trail, which is <br /> highly disturbed from bike travel but allows for 100%ground visibility. No cultural resources were identified <br /> during the survey(Appendix C). <br /> Impact Discussion <br /> a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource <br /> pursuant to§15064.5? <br /> See Section 3.5(b), below. Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. <br /> b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological <br /> resource pursuant to§15064.5? <br /> A records search was completed for the current project site and a 0.5-mile radius on March 25, <br /> 2021 (Appendix C). The records search did not identify any cultural resources within the APE. <br /> Results of a Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File search, provided <br /> March 2, 2021, did not identify resources within the search area, which included U.S. Geological <br /> Survey sections intersecting the project site and surrounding 0.5-mile buffer. No additional <br /> archaeological or built environment resources are previously documented on the project site. One <br /> cultural resource, the main clubhouse of the Castlewood Country Club, is located approximately <br /> 0.45 miles east of the APE. An intensive pedestrian survey conducted of the project site on April <br /> 12, 2021 did not identify any cultural resources. The project site is undeveloped, and surface <br /> visibility within the APE is low (<5% visibility) due to vegetation. Based on observation of present <br /> conditions and soil development in the area, there is a low potential for currently unidentified <br /> cultural material or deposits to be encountered during project implementation and/or future use <br /> of the area (Appendix C). <br /> The project would have no impact to known cultural resources. However,there is a low possibility <br /> for the project to inadvertently impact currently unidentified cultural resources. Archaeological <br /> protection measures for potential discoveries of cultural resources are identified in MM-CUL-1.With <br /> implementation of MM-CUL-1, impacts to archaeological resources would be less than significant. <br /> Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. <br /> C) Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated <br /> cemeteries? <br /> The project site does not have any association with a cemetery or mausoleum and was not used <br /> historically for burial or internment purposes. No known human remains or burial sites were <br /> 12956 <br /> DUDEK 47 April 2022 <br />