My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3_Exhibit C
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
02-22
>
3_Exhibit C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 1:30:15 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 1:15:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/22/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
3
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\02-22
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1857
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Stoneridge Mall Residential Project <br />Section 15183 Checklist/15164 Addendum CEQA Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 119 <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480017/Consistency Checklist/21480017 Stoneridge Mall Residential Project Checklist <br />Addendum_Updated.docx <br />project area with respect to hazardous emissions or the handling of hazardous materials, substances, <br />or waste. Therefore, impacts would continue to be less than significant, and no mitigation is <br />necessary, consistent with the Prior EIR. There are no proposed changes, new circumstances, or new <br />information that would cause new or more severe impacts. <br />Therefore, there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project or the <br />parcels on which the proposed project would be located. Impacts would be less than significant and <br />the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not <br />previously identified in the Prior EIR. <br />d) Hazardous Materials Sites <br />Prior EIR Conclusions <br />The Prior EIR found that two sites proposed for development are known to have contained or been <br />adjacent to a hazard materials release or contamination that has not been fully remediated. It was <br />determined that development on sites that have been identified as requiring further site <br />characterization and/or remediation work would be required to ensure that construction activities <br />would not expose people or the environment to adverse effects. Tab le 4.G-1 in the Prior EIR <br />identifies properties in the vicinity of the residential sites that are on the Cortese List. Site 3, which <br />contains the project site, is not in the vicinity of any of the listed sites. Therefore, the Prior EIR <br />determined that development on the site relevant to the proposed project would be less than <br />significant in relation to hazardous materials sites. <br />Analysis of Proposed Project <br />The project-specific Phase I ESA prepared by APEX Companies (Appendix F) indicated that the project <br />site is not listed on any hazardous material databases. As described above, no known contamination <br />exists on the project site. In the event that contamination is discovered, General Plan Public Safety <br />Element Policy 17, which requires that any contamination identified on-site must be remediated <br />prior to development, would be in effect. Therefore, impacts would continue to be less than <br />significant, and no mitigation is necessary, consistent with the Prior EIR. There are no proposed <br />changes, new circumstances, or new information that would cause new or more severe impacts. <br />Therefore, there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project or the <br />parcels on which the proposed project would be located. Impacts would be less than significant and <br />the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not <br />previously identified in the Prior EIR. <br />e) Airports <br />Prior EIR Conclusions <br />The Prior EIR found that several of the potential sites for housing development under the Housing <br />Element are located within the boundaries of the Alameda County Airport Land Use Policy Plan’s <br />General Referral Area, which is coterminous with the Alameda County Airport Land Use Commission <br />(ALUC) Hazard Prevention Zone. In addition, some of the potential sites for housing development
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.