3_Exhibit C - Laserfiche WebLink

City of Pleasanton—Stoneridge Mall Residential Project Section 15183 Checklist/15164 Addendum CEQA Checklist FirstCarbon Solutions 121 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480017/Consistency Checklist/21480017 Stoneridge Mall Residential Project Checklist Addendum_Updated.docx Analysis of Proposed Project The project site would be required to comply with applicable goals and policies from the Public Safety Element of the General Plan. In addition, the proposed project would also not interfere with guidelines set forth in the Pleasanton Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan and Alameda County Disaster Plan. Therefore, impacts would continue to be less than significant, and no mitigation is necessary, consistent with the Prior EIR. There are no proposed changes, new circumstances, or new information that would cause new or more severe impacts. Therefore, there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project or the parcels on which the proposed project would be located. Impacts would be less than significant and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the Prior EIR. g)–j) Wildland Fires The Prior EIR considered whether the Housing Element would • Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. Additional checklist questions were added to the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G Checklist in 2018 and did not exist at the time the Prior EIR was certified. These questions address Wildfire in its own topical section and considered whether the project would: • Because of slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? • Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power liens or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? • Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? The following Wildfire questions are addressed in the analysis of the proposed project below in order to evaluate wildfire risks consistent with the City’s thresholds of significance. Prior EIR Conclusions The Prior EIR found that all of the potential sites for rezoning from the Housing Element are located outside of the designated wildland-urban interface threat areas within Pleasanton. In addition, Policy 13 of the Public Safety Element of the General Plan sets standards for building sprinklers and fire response systems, and requires the City to work with the California Department of Forestry and the Fire Prevention and Firewise Communities to develop additional protection measures. Given the above information and further policies from the General Plan Public Safety Element relevant to