3_Exhibit C - Laserfiche WebLink

2.Mitigation Measures 4.D-1a and 4.D-1b include the requirement for a historic resource evaluation at Sites 6 and 21. Mitigation Measure D-1 a and D-1 b as set forth in Table 6-1 of the Final EIR and listed in the MMRP are hereby incorporated by reference and described below: 4.D-1 a: On Sites 6 and 21, prior to PUD approval or demolition, whichever comes first, the project applicant shall have a historic resource evaluation conducted for the ice house and farmhouse on Site 6 and for the residence on Site 21 as applicable. If it is determined that a structure is historic, Mitigation Measure 4.D-1b will be required. If a structure is not found to be historic, demolition of the structure will be considered a less than significant impact. 4.D-lb: If the historic resources evaluation determines that Site 6 or 21 contains a historic resource, prior to demolition, the structure shall be documented according to Historic American Building Survey (HABS) standards. These standards include large format black and white photographs, an historical narrative describing the architectural and historical characteristics of the building, and measured drawings (or reproduced existing drawings if available). The HABS documentation shall be archived at the City of Pleasanton Planning Department and the City of Pleasanton Public Library. 3.Implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.D-1a and 4.D-lb would not reduce the impact to less than significant as demolition of the structures on Site 6 and 2lcould result in an adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. Draft SEIR, pp. 4.D-15 to 4.D-16.) 2. Transportation and Traffic Impact 4.N-7 Development facilitated by the General Plan Amendment and rezonings could potentially add traffic to the regional roadway network to the point at which they would operate unacceptably under Cumulative plus Project conditions. The SEIR evaluates the impact of the proposed project related to the potential to add traffic to the regional roadway network to the point at which they would operate unacceptably under Cumulative plus Project conditions. Significance Before Mitigation: Significant Significance After Mitigation: Significant and Unavoidable Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project, however, the changes would not reduce this impact to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measure 4.N-7 is required in or incorporated into the Project.