3_Exhibit C - Laserfiche WebLink

6.megaton Monitoring and Reporting Program TABLE 6.1(Continued) MITIGATION MONITORING ANO REPORTING PROGRAM Site(s) Implementation Monitoring Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring Verification of Mitigation Measures Affected Procedures Responsibility Action Schedule Compliance approved mitigation bank for burrowing owl. Mitigation Measure 4.C.2:Consistent with the Alameda County 16,8,9,10, Project applicant will hire a Community Review and approval of Prior to issuance Verified by' Watercourse Protection Ordinance,no new grading or 13,20.21 biologist as described and Development biologist Review and of grading and development at Sites 8,8,9,10,13.20.or 21 shall be allowed will design and construct Department approval of the construction building permit. whin 20 feet of the edge of riparian vegetation or top of bank, project as described. plan. whichever is further from the creek centerline,as delineated by Dale: a qualified,City-approved biologist. Inspect site during construction to ensure Field inspections compliance with project during construction plans.cone cton. D.Cultural Resources Mitigation Meeeure lDle On Sites 6 and 21,prior to PUD 6,21 Project applicant will hire a Community Review and approval of the Prior to PUD 'Verified by approval or demolition,whichever coma first the prefect applicant quallfled architectural Development historian and the historic approval or that have a histb resource evaluation conducted for the ice historian to conduct an Department evaluation. demolition, house,farmhouse and associated structures at Site 6 and for the 1 evaluation,whichever occurs resitlence on Site 21 as applicabte.If it e determined Meta first. Dale: structure is historic,Mitigation Measure 4.0-lb wit be required.If the sttctwe is not bob to be Neat,demolition of the structure wit be considered a less than significant impact. Mitigation Measure 4.1:1-11:c If the historic resources evaluation 6,21 If the historic resources Community Review and approval of the Prior to Verified by determines Mel Sites 6 or 21 romans a historic resource,prior to evaluation In mitigation Development historian.Review of written demolition. demolition,the structure shall be documented according to Hlataic measure 4.0-la determines Department verification that required American Building Survey(NABS)standards.These standards the site contains a historic documentation submitted. re large format deck end white pletogre anphs, historical resource,the project Dale: idud narrative describing the achgadual aid historical deredededcs of applicant will hire a qualified. the bulling,and measured drawings(or reproduced existing architectural historian to drawings If available).The NABS documentation shall be archived prepare documentation at the City of Pleasanton Planning Depatr ent and the City of accenting to HAGS Pleasanton Pubic library. standards,and file documentation with the State Historic Preservation Officer,the HABS/HAER collections in the Library of 1 Congress,the University of i California at Berkeley 1 Bancroft Library.the City of Pleasanton Library,the City of Pleasanton Planning Division.and provide written verification that the documentation has been filed. easel rwr a nenrsn.nr wed as one r. 68 ESA 171001e reel 5Ypgm.MY EmwnnxnW Impact aetot December 3011