My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3_Exhibit C
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
02-22
>
3_Exhibit C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 1:30:15 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 1:15:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/22/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
3
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\02-22
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1857
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Stoneridge Mall Residential Project <br />CEQA Checklist Section 15183 Checklist/15164 Addendum <br /> <br /> <br />84 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480017/Consistency Checklist/21480017 Stoneridge Mall Residential Project Checklist <br />Addendum_Updated.docx <br />0.5-mile search radius. The NAHC response recommended reaching out to an included list of 13 <br />tribal representatives available for consultation. To ensure that all Native American knowledge and <br />concerns over potential TCRs that may be affected by the proposed project are addressed, a letter <br />containing project information and requesting any additional information was sent to each tribal <br />representative on November 21, 2022. A response was received from Chairperson Corrina Gould of <br />the Confederated Villages of Lisjan Nation on January 4, 2023, stating that the California Historical <br />Resources Information System (CHRIS) results show the area has been very active for their Tribe , and <br />expressing an interest in seeing that a full archaeological report is completed for the proposed <br />project. FCS reconfirmed the results with Senior Archaeologist Charles Mikulik, who performed the <br />records search at the NWIC. On January 10, FCS responded to Chairperson Gould by sharing the <br />CHRIS results that showed no precontact resources have been mapped within the 0.5-mile search <br />radius surrounding the project site, or within the project site itself, despite over 60 previous studies <br />having been performed within the radius. FCS also shared the negative results of the pedestrian <br />survey that was part of the cultural resources study prepared for the proposed project. In addition to <br />the negative pedestrian survey and CHRIS results, FCS noted the fully developed and hardscaped <br />nature of the project site, leading to the conclusion that it is unlikely precontact archaeological <br />resources would be encountered during project construction. FCS requested any additional <br />information on the project area the Tribe may be in possession of and offered to address any <br />additional concerns. No additional responses have been received to date. <br />Northwest Information Center <br />In order to determine the presence or absence of cultural and historical resources within the project <br />site, a records search and literature review was conducted for the project site and a standard 0.5- <br />mile search radius on October 11, 2022, at the NWIC, located California State University, Sonoma. <br />The purpose of this review was to access existing cultural resource survey reports, archaeological <br />site records and historic maps, and evaluate whether any previously documented prehistoric or <br />historic archaeological sites, architectural resources, cultural landscapes, or other resources exist <br />within or near the project site. To identify additional historic properties or resources, the current <br />inventories of the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), the California Register of Historical <br />Resources (CRHR), the California Historical Landmarks (CHL) list, the California Points of Historical <br />Interest (CPHI) list, and the California Built Environment Resource Directory (BERD) for Alameda <br />County. The records search results failed to identify any prehistoric or historic resources within the <br />project site. However, one historic resource was identified in its 0.5-mile search radius. The search <br />identified one report that includes the project site, and 60 reports within a 0.5-mile search radius of <br />the project site. This indicates that the project site has previously been surveyed for cultural <br />resources with negative results. A records search map identifying the project boundaries and a 0.5- <br />mile search radius along with a list of reports and resources from the NWIC can be found in <br />Appendix D. <br />Pedestrian Survey <br />On November 30, 2022, FCS Senior Archaeologist Dr. Dana DePietro conducted a pedestrian survey <br />for unrecorded cultural resources within the project site boundary. The project site consists almost <br />entirely of hardscaped pavement that serves as an existing parking lot for the Stoneridge Mall. The
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.